WARNING: SMALL SAMPLE SIZE AHEADNow that the biggest warning is out of the way, here's what this is: A
very quick look at how a players experience in college translates to NBA success (as defined by the number of all star games they have played in their careers thus far)
Some issues with the data:
- No one in the past 3 drafts has made an all star game (yet), which may skew the numbers
- I've only looked at the past 10 years (2006 draft to 2015)
- The sample size is really small
- Just looking at All Star games isn't a great measure of NBA success, and rates a borderline all star the same as a total bust
Now that those are out of the way, here are the main findings:
As you can see, among top 10 picks, Freshman are most likely to be picked, and have the second most all star games/player (helped especially by Kevin Durant's 7). Surprisingly, however, Sophmores rate best by this metric (helped a lot by Westbrook and LMA with 5 each). Juniors rate the worst, although given the sample sizes for them and seniors, it is really meaningless. For international players, things don't look good, but, again, it's a small sample size, so you can't really draw any conclusions from it. There's also the Enes Kanter category for players who were ruled ineligible to play in the NBA but didn't go overseas
So what can we conclude from this? Not a whole lot. The sample sizes are pretty tiny, and the numbers are all pretty close. If anything, it can help to settle the "Freshman vs. Senior" debate by saying that it doesn't really seem to matter (although teams clearly like taking Freshmen more)
Take the best prospect, it's all a crapshoot anyway
(Thank you LooseCannon for the idea, and if any wants to go through the data/add to it, feel free. I can send you the excel file I used as well.)