Author Topic: Celtics (39-27) at Pacers (35-31) Game #67 3/15/16  (Read 24371 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (39-27) at Pacers (35-31) Game #67 3/15/16
« Reply #15 on: March 15, 2016, 01:11:12 PM »

Offline greece66

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7395
  • Tommy Points: 1342
  • Head Paperboy at Greenville
I don't like our chances.
The team hasn't been playing good after long time off.
you mean the same celtics team who is 7-3 over their past 10 games? they may not be playing great, but chopped liver they aint.

ps. thanks for the thread flc. tp as ever.

gooooo celtics!!  ;D

We ve had a great season. Absolutely worst case scenario for us now is fall down to 5th seed. No biggie rly.

In the meantime, some of our younger players will take more mins, and we will end up with one (maybe even two) lottery picks.

Re: Celtics (39-27) at Pacers (35-31) Game #67 3/15/16
« Reply #16 on: March 15, 2016, 04:13:23 PM »

Offline Denis998

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3308
  • Tommy Points: 388
  • Rutgers '17
i hope the team isnt rusty from having a few days off.

Re: Celtics (39-27) at Pacers (35-31) Game #67 3/15/16
« Reply #17 on: March 15, 2016, 04:14:49 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8595
  • Tommy Points: 842
I don't like our chances.
The team hasn't been playing good after long time off.
you mean the same celtics team who is 7-3 over their past 10 games? they may not be playing great, but chopped liver they aint.

ps. thanks for the thread flc. tp as ever.

gooooo celtics!!  ;D

We ve had a great season. Absolutely worst case scenario for us now is fall down to 5th seed. No biggie rly.

In the meantime, some of our younger players will take more mins, and we will end up with one (maybe even two) lottery picks.
We are two games out of the 6 seed.
Quote from: George W. Bush
Too often, we judge other groups by their worst examples while judging ourselves by our best intentions.

Re: Celtics (39-27) at Pacers (35-31) Game #67 3/15/16
« Reply #18 on: March 15, 2016, 05:12:46 PM »

Offline greece66

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7395
  • Tommy Points: 1342
  • Head Paperboy at Greenville
I don't like our chances.
The team hasn't been playing good after long time off.
you mean the same celtics team who is 7-3 over their past 10 games? they may not be playing great, but chopped liver they aint.

ps. thanks for the thread flc. tp as ever.

gooooo celtics!!  ;D

We ve had a great season. Absolutely worst case scenario for us now is fall down to 5th seed. No biggie rly.

In the meantime, some of our younger players will take more mins, and we will end up with one (maybe even two) lottery picks.
We are two games out of the 6 seed.

6th gives you better playoff matchups than 5th. 

Re: Celtics (39-27) at Pacers (35-31) Game #67 3/15/16
« Reply #19 on: March 15, 2016, 05:42:53 PM »

Offline alldaboston

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4170
  • Tommy Points: 324
Smart is starting.
I could very well see the Hawks... starting Taurean Prince at the 3, who is already better than Crowder, imo.

you vs. the guy she tells you not to worry about

Re: Celtics (39-27) at Pacers (35-31) Game #67 3/15/16
« Reply #20 on: March 15, 2016, 05:54:42 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8595
  • Tommy Points: 842
I don't like our chances.
The team hasn't been playing good after long time off.
you mean the same celtics team who is 7-3 over their past 10 games? they may not be playing great, but chopped liver they aint.

ps. thanks for the thread flc. tp as ever.

gooooo celtics!!  ;D

We ve had a great season. Absolutely worst case scenario for us now is fall down to 5th seed. No biggie rly.

In the meantime, some of our younger players will take more mins, and we will end up with one (maybe even two) lottery picks.
We are two games out of the 6 seed.

6th gives you better playoff matchups than 5th.
ah. I assumed you just meant seeding.

Yeah, 5th at this point would be tough.
Quote from: George W. Bush
Too often, we judge other groups by their worst examples while judging ourselves by our best intentions.

Re: Celtics (39-27) at Pacers (35-31) Game #67 3/15/16
« Reply #21 on: March 15, 2016, 05:55:29 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48140
  • Tommy Points: 2922
Smart is starting at the 3, and no Kelly tonight..... again. I'm really starting to worry about Kelly, because this seems to be more of a mental deal than anything else. From everything I've heard and seen, he's been cleared to play for several games now, and it's ultimately just been up to him. He wasn't the most mentally tough player to begin with, so I'm really starting to worry that this injury is in his head.

Re: Celtics (39-27) at Pacers (35-31) Game #67 3/15/16
« Reply #22 on: March 15, 2016, 05:56:55 PM »

Offline Denis998

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3308
  • Tommy Points: 388
  • Rutgers '17
This Kelly situation is getting the whole "Derrick Rose" feel to it. Seems like he is never coming back from this injury, its been over a month.

Re: Celtics (39-27) at Pacers (35-31) Game #67 3/15/16
« Reply #23 on: March 15, 2016, 06:00:57 PM »

Offline Quetzalcoatl

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4098
  • Tommy Points: 419
This Kelly situation is getting the whole "Derrick Rose" feel to it. Seems like he is never coming back from this injury, its been over a month.

That might be a tad of an overstatement

Re: Celtics (39-27) at Pacers (35-31) Game #67 3/15/16
« Reply #24 on: March 15, 2016, 06:08:01 PM »

Offline Denis998

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3308
  • Tommy Points: 388
  • Rutgers '17
This Kelly situation is getting the whole "Derrick Rose" feel to it. Seems like he is never coming back from this injury, its been over a month.

That might be a tad of an overstatement
Just a tad lol. But really, he has been cleared for practice for a while now, and seems like a disservice to the team to sit out more games considering Jae is also out.

Re: Celtics (39-27) at Pacers (35-31) Game #67 3/15/16
« Reply #25 on: March 15, 2016, 06:14:19 PM »

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17840
  • Tommy Points: 2663
  • bammokja
I don't like our chances.
The team hasn't been playing good after long time off.
you mean the same celtics team who is 7-3 over their past 10 games? they may not be playing great, but chopped liver they aint.

ps. thanks for the thread flc. tp as ever.

gooooo celtics!!  ;D

We ve had a great season. Absolutely worst case scenario for us now is fall down to 5th seed. No biggie rly.

In the meantime, some of our younger players will take more mins, and we will end up with one (maybe even two) lottery picks.
We are two games out of the 6 seed.

6th gives you better playoff matchups than 5th.
i love the optimism g666. a tp for you sir!
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva

Re: Celtics (39-27) at Pacers (35-31) Game #67 3/15/16
« Reply #26 on: March 15, 2016, 06:14:40 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8595
  • Tommy Points: 842
Im actually excited. As Rollie mentioned, this is agreat opportunity for someone to step up.

Jae and Kelly out of the lineup there is no longer any excuse. Everyone needs to be ready to go.

I am confident in this team. I am confident in Brad. Someone will step up, of that I am irrationally confident. Who will it be? I have no idea.
Quote from: George W. Bush
Too often, we judge other groups by their worst examples while judging ourselves by our best intentions.

Re: Celtics (39-27) at Pacers (35-31) Game #67 3/15/16
« Reply #27 on: March 15, 2016, 06:23:12 PM »

Offline greece66

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7395
  • Tommy Points: 1342
  • Head Paperboy at Greenville
Smart is starting at the 3, and no Kelly tonight..... again. I'm really starting to worry about Kelly, because this seems to be more of a mental deal than anything else. From everything I've heard and seen, he's been cleared to play for several games now, and it's ultimately just been up to him. He wasn't the most mentally tough player to begin with, so I'm really starting to worry that this injury is in his head.

Good to know we'll try sthg new instead of starting ET at 3. More fun to watch.

Re: Celtics (39-27) at Pacers (35-31) Game #67 3/15/16
« Reply #28 on: March 15, 2016, 06:31:59 PM »

Offline tarheelsxxiii

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8593
  • Tommy Points: 1389
Don't care if all the other youngn's of the world - Booker, Russell, Gordon - are playing for weak teams. Time for Smart to make a mini-leap of his own. If Russell can already go off for 39, Booker already for 35, etc... Smart needs to show something now. This is getting boring. Just show us something resembling offensive talent, even if it's trickery.
The Tarstradamus Group, LLC

Re: Celtics (39-27) at Pacers (35-31) Game #67 3/15/16
« Reply #29 on: March 15, 2016, 06:38:11 PM »

Offline Denis998

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3308
  • Tommy Points: 388
  • Rutgers '17
Don't care if all the other youngn's of the world - Booker, Russell, Gordon - are playing for weak teams. Time for Smart to make a mini-leap of his own. If Russell can already go off for 39, Booker already for 35, etc... Smart needs to show something now. This is getting boring. Just show us something resembling offensive talent, even if it's trickery.
I bet if Marcus was guarding any of them none would have reached 15 points. I do think he should focus on the mid range game like chris paul