Poll

Would You trade 2016 and 2018 Nets picks for Dangelo

Yes
4 (8.9%)
No
35 (77.8%)
If the pick is three or lower Yes.
6 (13.3%)

Total Members Voted: 45

Author Topic: Poll: 2 Nets picks for Russell  (Read 2442 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Poll: 2 Nets picks for Russell
« on: March 06, 2016, 08:10:40 PM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8635
  • Tommy Points: 1136

 Get him while he's hot. If that's available do you take it. They decide he's a punk and that's the best deal they can get.

 He is a smart player, just not a smart person yet..

Re: Poll: 2 Nets picks for Russell
« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2016, 08:14:30 PM »

Offline KeepRondo

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • Tommy Points: 215
How about Smart for Russell.

Re: Poll: 2 Nets picks for Russell
« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2016, 08:21:41 PM »

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7508
  • Tommy Points: 742
In a vacuum, he's probably worth it but with IT and Smart on the roster right now, I don't see the point.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008

Re: Poll: 2 Nets picks for Russell
« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2016, 08:35:41 PM »

Offline jdz101

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3171
  • Tommy Points: 404
Hard no.


how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck was chris bosh?

Re: Poll: 2 Nets picks for Russell
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2016, 08:39:38 PM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8635
  • Tommy Points: 1136

 I kind of like the in a vacuum comment. But TP for the best explanation of "in a vaccum" 

Re: Poll: 2 Nets picks for Russell
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2016, 08:44:18 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
I mean, a lot of that would be contingent on where the pick lands, right?   If you end up with Ben Simmons, you probably would rather just keep him.   But if it ends up 4-6 a case can certainly be made that Russell will be better than both picks combined.  Just depends how the draft shakes out and who is available.

Russell will be a stud, though.  Said for a while that I'd gladly gamble on him over Marcus Smart.  He's picking up steam right now.

Here's what I said in the other thread:

Quote
His stats for the season of 13 points, 3.5 rebounds, 3.5 assists, 1.1 steals with 42% shooting an 36% from three in just 27.7mpg are pretty solid for a 20 year old rookie PG.  Marcus Smart is in his second year averaging 9.6 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3 assists, 1.7 steals with 35% shooting and 27% from the line and most of us still expect him to be a very good player long term.

They inserted Russell back into the starting lineup 8 games ago and while he had one dud game, he's been pretty sensational recently.
2/24 - 22 points, 8 assists, 4 rebounds 42%/33%/75% ...
2/26 - 22 points, 3 assists, 3 rebounds, 67%/100%/67% ...
3/1 - 39 points, 6 rebounds, 3 assists, 1 steal 67%/67%/60% ...
3/2 - 24 points, 6 assists, 1 rebound 1 steal 43%/33%/60% ...
 then today - 21 points, 5 asissts, 3 rebounds, 4 steals, 43%/43%/100%

He's getting into a grove, which is what you should expect from a #2 pick believed to have superstar potential during the second half of their rookie year.   Long-term, he looks like he'll be a star.

Not sure I buy the idea that the Lakers would move him.  He's the most exciting part of that franchise right now... I feel like the "trade D'Angelo" movement is an old narrative from when he didn't immediately show up as a 20 year old superstar.   Good luck prying him away now.  The kid clearly has game.  His start mirrors Andrew Wiggins.  Wiggins struggled out of the gate and picked up steam over the second half.  I can't imagine the WOlves giving up Wiggins for a #4-6 pick in this draft + a future 1st.  That'd be pretty dumb.  Actually, D'Angelo's first half rookie numbers might actually be better than Wiggin's first half rookie numbers last season.  And just like Wiggins, D'Angelo is showing improvement over the second half.  18.8 points, 4.8 assists, 3 rebounds with 47%/47%/69% shooting since the all-star break.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2016, 08:51:42 PM by LarBrd33 »

Re: Poll: 2 Nets picks for Russell
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2016, 08:49:50 PM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8635
  • Tommy Points: 1136

 Yeah, he got game. That's why Ainge needs to get his game.

Re: Poll: 2 Nets picks for Russell
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2016, 08:54:46 PM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8635
  • Tommy Points: 1136

 It is crazy that everyone's in love with these picks. I mean, it's not going to be a top two pick. SO why not give up one more lottery pick for a guy you know has superstar potential.

Re: Poll: 2 Nets picks for Russell
« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2016, 09:06:37 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8595
  • Tommy Points: 842

 It is crazy that everyone's in love with these picks. I mean, it's not going to be a top two pick. SO why not give up one more lottery pick for a guy you know has superstar potential.
We have a 21 to 31 % chance at a top 2 pick.

Let's not act like there is no chance we get a top 2 pick.
Quote from: George W. Bush
Too often, we judge other groups by their worst examples while judging ourselves by our best intentions.

Re: Poll: 2 Nets picks for Russell
« Reply #9 on: March 07, 2016, 02:46:11 AM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8635
  • Tommy Points: 1136

 Let's bet 20 Tp's on it then. I know we are not getting a top 2 pick. I have "sources"

Re: Poll: 2 Nets picks for Russell
« Reply #10 on: March 07, 2016, 02:53:20 AM »

Offline chambers

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7482
  • Tommy Points: 943
  • Boston Celtics= Championships, nothing less.
Yes. Hell yes. The Nets pick could be number 5.

Jesus do people watch any other teams or do people hate him because he's a Laker?

He's going to be a superstar.
"We are lucky we have a very patient GM that isn't willing to settle for being good and coming close. He wants to win a championship and we have the potential to get there still with our roster and assets."

quoting 'Greg B' on RealGM after 2017 trade deadline.
Read that last line again. One more time.

Re: Poll: 2 Nets picks for Russell
« Reply #11 on: March 07, 2016, 02:56:59 AM »

Offline LatterDayCelticsfan

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2195
  • Tommy Points: 171
  • Community Text
One Piock, not both
Banner 18 please 😍

Re: Poll: 2 Nets picks for Russell
« Reply #12 on: March 08, 2016, 07:10:11 PM »

Offline Irish Stew

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1080
  • Tommy Points: 56
Why would you ever trade someone playing like this for two unknown teenagers?

Re: Poll: 2 Nets picks for Russell
« Reply #13 on: March 08, 2016, 07:15:22 PM »

Offline Quetzalcoatl

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4098
  • Tommy Points: 419
I'd rather have Simmons or Ingram, although there is no guarantee of either of course.  I like Jaylen Brown about 85% as much as I like Russell and he is very realistic.  We already have IT and Smart as team leaders, although I suppose we could package them.  I will concede that I like D'Angelo a lot.

Re: Poll: 2 Nets picks for Russell
« Reply #14 on: March 08, 2016, 07:18:17 PM »

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7508
  • Tommy Points: 742

 I kind of like the in a vacuum comment. But TP for the best explanation of "in a vaccum"
"Isolated from the context normal to it and in which it can best be understood or assessed."

Per google searching the phrase. In other words, not caring about any other factors relevant to the situation.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008