If were putting just about all of our assets in the pot as "fair game", including Smart, Thomas, Crowder, KO, etc. and our next two Brooklyn picks, you'd have to hope we do better than a 30 year old Howard and Gallo right?
Assuming it's just picks, you get:
IT/Bradley/Crowder/Gallo/Howard with
Smart/Turner/Jerebko/Olynyk/Amir or Zeller coming off the bench, or something like it. Gotta figure at least Sully and Lee, plus a prospect or two go out in a trade with the picks.
I'm not so sure that even gets us in the finals the next two years, and if it costs 2 Brooklyn picks there's no way I do that deal, even if it gives us an outside chance of getting demolished in the finals. That Brooklyn pick this year is almost guaranteed top 5, with a solid chance at top 3. 2017 is likely top 10 at least, good chance at top 5 again. That's where out chance at a transcendent superstar lie. We traded #5 for Ray Allen and Baby Davis once. If you put prime RA on this team, you might have a better contender than adding Gallo and DH at the deadline.
I'm all for Howard, Horford or Gallo for that matter, just only at the right price. We have a bunch of guys and a bunch of picks that could push the needle for someone but are almost excess to us. If we can get Howard for Lee, Sullinger, Zeller and a couple non-Brooklyn 1sts I might do that. If we can get Gallo for Sully, Jerebko, Young and the Dallas pick, I'd prob be for that too. But we're not giving up the 2016 Brooklyn 1st for Howard or Gallo. Or Hayward for that matter. There's maybe 10 guys in the NBA Danny will trade our best assets for and those guys don't fit the bill.