Trade Ideas: Boston/Atlanta/Milwaukee and Boston/New Orleans

[Evantime34]

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=hhhtbqw

To Atlanta: Greg Monroe, Evan Turner
To Milwaukee: Jeff Teague, Jared Sullinger, Tyler Zeller
To Boston: Al Horford

We would probably have to trade a pick or two but I'm not sure which pick(s), would go to which teams.

Second Trade
To New Orleans: David Lee, 2nd round pick
To Boston:  Eric Gordon (yes I know he's injured but he'll be back shortly after the deadline.

Why for Boston: we consolidate the back end of our rotation and add a fringe all star in Horford who is more likely to stay in Boston if he experiences a playoff run here first. Eric Gordon could fill Evan Turner's role once healthy.

Why for Atlanta: They have expressed interest in Monroe in the past. The Hawks are ready to move on from Teague and give the reigns to Schroeder. Turner can handle the back up pg spot for Atlanta.

Why for Milwaukee: They add a pg they need (they have been rumored to be in the running for Teague). They get replacement centers for Monroe who probably will opt out after this year and they get a pick which is useful since they aren't making the playoffs this year.

Why for New Orleans: They are getting a pick for Gordon, who almost certainly is leaving in free agency.

[chilidawg]

I think Horford would be a great fit, assuming we can resign him, and the price is exceptionally reasonable for us.

I'd trade DLee and 2nds for a bag of donuts, but I don't see Gordon as a fit

[Evantime34]

I think Horford would be a great fit, assuming we can resign him, and the price is exceptionally reasonable for us.

I'd trade DLee and 2nds for a bag of donuts, but I don't see Gordon as a fit

Thanks.

I see Gordon as a good fit because he can handle the ball a little bit and spaces the floor on the second unit with Olynyk and Jerebko.

[Who]

I am going to say Atlanta says no and New Orleans say no.

New Orleans = a 2nd round pick is not enough for the talent downgrade from E.Gordon to D.Lee. 2nds have very little value. Unless you are Hinkie.

Atlanta = I don't think Monroe is enough for both Teague and Horford. For one (Horford) or the other (Teague), yes, but not both. 

Good trade for Milwaukee and Boston.

[Evantime34]

I am going to say Atlanta says no and New Orleans say no.

New Orleans = a 2nd round pick is not enough for the talent downgrade from E.Gordon to D.Lee. 2nds have very little value. Unless you are Hinkie.

Atlanta = I don't think Monroe is enough for both Teague and Horford. For one (Horford) or the other (Teague), yes, but not both. 

Good trade for Milwaukee and Boston.

So for new Orleans I was thinking the Minnesota or Philadelphia second which will be in the top 5 of the second round. If they are clearly not making the playoffs the talent downgrade for an expiring contract isn't a big deal.

As to the issue with Atlanta I'd be willing to add a pick to make the deal more even.

[Sketch5]

So we make a deal with Milwaukee and you don't work it out to bring Parker hear as well?