Author Topic: GSW start... How much credit does Luke Walton deserve?  (Read 1663 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GSW start... How much credit does Luke Walton deserve?
« on: November 24, 2015, 10:53:43 PM »

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871
Is it not amazing that Luke Walton the coach is about to make NBA history?

Re: GSW start... How much credit does Luke Walton deserve?
« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2015, 10:59:12 PM »

Offline bopna

  • NGT
  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2367
  • Tommy Points: 136
Zip...nadda

This team has so far stayed away from injury and that is the reason why they are clicking on all cylinders..they just know all their roles. Even a high school coach can sit on the bench and GS will still win 60 games barring no injury.

Re: GSW start... How much credit does Luke Walton deserve?
« Reply #2 on: November 24, 2015, 11:15:39 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 36858
  • Tommy Points: 2968
Really

Not

Much

He just has to follow the same rotations as last year , with everybody healthy .


Even Doc could win another title .....LOL .......and look like Phil Jackson.... ;)

Re: GSW start... How much credit does Luke Walton deserve?
« Reply #3 on: November 24, 2015, 11:17:49 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 36858
  • Tommy Points: 2968
Is it not amazing that Luke Walton the coach is about to make NBA history?

No ......Doc could do it .

Re: GSW start... How much credit does Luke Walton deserve?
« Reply #4 on: November 24, 2015, 11:20:23 PM »

Offline tarheelsxxiii

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8593
  • Tommy Points: 1389
Funny enough, as interim coach, he actually doesn't get any formal credit. Walton is still 0-0 as far as record is concerned.
The Tarstradamus Group, LLC

Re: GSW start... How much credit does Luke Walton deserve?
« Reply #5 on: November 24, 2015, 11:22:09 PM »

Offline crimson_stallion

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5964
  • Tommy Points: 875
The team won the NBA championship last year and has made practically no significant roster changes this year.

Credit is close to zero.

Re: GSW start... How much credit does Luke Walton deserve?
« Reply #6 on: November 25, 2015, 12:10:12 AM »

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871
LOL yall are out of your minds.... why have a coach at all then?

Why not just roll the ball out and let them play...

Re: GSW start... How much credit does Luke Walton deserve?
« Reply #7 on: November 25, 2015, 04:58:45 AM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 47214
  • Tommy Points: 2402
Not surprised if Luke Walton becomes a very good coach. He was a very smart player, a hard worker, a great teammate and a good communicator. All strong traits for a player becoming a successful coach.

In terms of credit. It's hard to know. Ezeli is starting over Bogut. I don't know if that was Walton's decision or Steve Kerr's decision. It's hard to know how plugged in and how responsible Kerr is for decisions made at GSW right now. Kerr probably still is quite close to the team despite not being able to do practices and go to games. Walton is probably still just like a lead assistant only responsible for in-game coaching with Kerr handling most of the responsibilities. Plus, like others have said. Stable healthy team that was formed by two coaches (M.Jackson, S.Kerr) that just won the Championship. Easy group to coach so long as that coach doesn't try changing too many things.

Even before this, I would have considered Luke Walton a very good head coaching prospect and the job he is doing now only reaffirms that. Improves his chances considerably of getting a head coaching gig of his own next summer. I'd like to see him take over the Lakers (as rumoured). That would be nice. A home-coming of sorts. I like ex-players manage teams they have played for in the past.