how dare you refer to my show as "a radio talk show" !
Anyways, in all seriousness - I was a little more concerned about this game than he was, (or even Justin Poulin who came on for the pre-game lest we forget) - that's why I posed the question. It was almost as if the worst thing that could happen was beating the Nets as bad as they did. As young as this team is, I'm not quite sure they understand how important it is to bring energy to start games on the road. They've gotten away with it this year, it always concerned me. But it'd just be human nature for a team to get its manhood the way the Nets had it taken from them Friday - to come out strong. Celtics just needed to match that early on and then talent wise, should've been enough to grab the game. Instead, it was an uphill climb the rest of the way and they ran out of gas.
We shouldn't ever get upset over any losses this season...except Nets losses. For obviously reasons. Those are not even double-whammies. They are quintuple whammies. I'm definitely a little peeved this morning. And no, not at Mike Gorman for "jinxing" the Celtics. Or at the fans on Friday for "motivating" the Nets. Only one way our frustration should be directed at and we know what entity that is.