Author Topic: Celtics (1-2) at Pacers (1-3) Game #4 11/4/15  (Read 29467 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (1-2) at Pacers (1-3) Game #4 11/4/15
« Reply #45 on: November 04, 2015, 07:21:41 PM »

Offline YoungOne87

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1167
  • Tommy Points: 65
i dont like starting IT one bit

Re: Celtics (1-2) at Pacers (1-3) Game #4 11/4/15
« Reply #46 on: November 04, 2015, 07:22:04 PM »

Offline KeepRondo

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • Tommy Points: 215
Celts look very small 1-3 with IT, Bradley, Crowder out there.  Nobody over 6'4''.
How tall is Crowder ?

Listed at 6'6'', but on the broadcast earlier in the season he identified himself as 6'4''.

To be fair, that's probably his "without shoes" height.  At the draft combine he was measured 6'4.75'' without shoes, but at the Nets combine he was measured at 6'3.75'' without shoes.

Any way you slice it, Crowder does not have ideal height for the wing.  His wingspan is alright though.
wow then Smart must be under 6'2

Re: Celtics (1-2) at Pacers (1-3) Game #4 11/4/15
« Reply #47 on: November 04, 2015, 07:22:24 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Bradley has improved so much this season. It's hard to think he's not even 25 yet.

I'm curious what part of his game you think is so vastly improved.  He's averaging more assists than he has in the past, but it's a small sample size.  Otherwise, he's right around his career averages, or below, in every category.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Celtics (1-2) at Pacers (1-3) Game #4 11/4/15
« Reply #48 on: November 04, 2015, 07:22:51 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48137
  • Tommy Points: 2922
Every time I see Hill out there with that hair I think it's Josh Koscheck...

Re: Celtics (1-2) at Pacers (1-3) Game #4 11/4/15
« Reply #49 on: November 04, 2015, 07:22:55 PM »

Online Neurotic Guy

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23404
  • Tommy Points: 2522
Bradley has improved so much this season. It's hard to think he's not even 25 yet.

Agreed.  Would love to see him have a big offensive night tonight.

Re: Celtics (1-2) at Pacers (1-3) Game #4 11/4/15
« Reply #50 on: November 04, 2015, 07:23:19 PM »

Offline KeepRondo

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • Tommy Points: 215
Bradley has improved so much this season. It's hard to think he's not even 25 yet.

I'm curious what part of his game you think is so vastly improved.  He's averaging more assists than he has in the past, but it's a small sample size.  Otherwise, he's right around his career averages, or below, in every category.
Yeah seems like he's still searching for his role on this team.

Re: Celtics (1-2) at Pacers (1-3) Game #4 11/4/15
« Reply #51 on: November 04, 2015, 07:23:34 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Celts look very small 1-3 with IT, Bradley, Crowder out there.  Nobody over 6'4''.
How tall is Crowder ?

Listed at 6'6'', but on the broadcast earlier in the season he identified himself as 6'4''.

To be fair, that's probably his "without shoes" height.  At the draft combine he was measured 6'4.75'' without shoes, but at the Nets combine he was measured at 6'3.75'' without shoes.

Any way you slice it, Crowder does not have ideal height for the wing.  His wingspan is alright though.
wow then Smart must be under 6'2


Smart measured 6'2'' without shoes at the combine.

Crowder seems taller than he is because of his hair.


Thomas really looks out of place trying to defend against starters.  This is why he doesn't start, guys.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Celtics (1-2) at Pacers (1-3) Game #4 11/4/15
« Reply #52 on: November 04, 2015, 07:23:40 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48137
  • Tommy Points: 2922
Bradley has improved so much this season. It's hard to think he's not even 25 yet.

I'm curious what part of his game you think is so vastly improved.  He's averaging more assists than he has in the past, but it's a small sample size.  Otherwise, he's right around his career averages, or below, in every category.

Ball-handling mainly. You can tell he's much more comfortable handling the ball than previous years.

Re: Celtics (1-2) at Pacers (1-3) Game #4 11/4/15
« Reply #53 on: November 04, 2015, 07:24:30 PM »

Offline bostonsportsforlife

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 483
  • Tommy Points: 23
You can't blow a 4 on 1 like that...

Re: Celtics (1-2) at Pacers (1-3) Game #4 11/4/15
« Reply #54 on: November 04, 2015, 07:24:30 PM »

Online Neurotic Guy

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23404
  • Tommy Points: 2522
Wow.  Some bad fast break there.

Re: Celtics (1-2) at Pacers (1-3) Game #4 11/4/15
« Reply #55 on: November 04, 2015, 07:24:41 PM »

Offline Rondo9

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5379
  • Tommy Points: 277
Celts look very small 1-3 with IT, Bradley, Crowder out there.  Nobody over 6'4''.
How tall is Crowder ?

Listed at 6'6'', but on the broadcast earlier in the season he identified himself as 6'4''.

To be fair, that's probably his "without shoes" height.  At the draft combine he was measured 6'4.75'' without shoes, but at the Nets combine he was measured at 6'3.75'' without shoes.

Any way you slice it, Crowder does not have ideal height for the wing.  His wingspan is alright though.
wow then Smart must be under 6'2


Smart measured 6'2'' without shoes at the combine.

Crowder seems taller than he is because of his hair.


Thomas really looks out of place trying to defend against starters.  This is why he doesn't start, guys.

Are they scoring against him?

Re: Celtics (1-2) at Pacers (1-3) Game #4 11/4/15
« Reply #56 on: November 04, 2015, 07:25:18 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48137
  • Tommy Points: 2922
i dont like starting IT one bit
Nope, not at all. It just does not suit him. We're actually really missing Smart out there.

Re: Celtics (1-2) at Pacers (1-3) Game #4 11/4/15
« Reply #57 on: November 04, 2015, 07:25:21 PM »

Offline KeepRondo

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • Tommy Points: 215
Celts look very small 1-3 with IT, Bradley, Crowder out there.  Nobody over 6'4''.
How tall is Crowder ?

Listed at 6'6'', but on the broadcast earlier in the season he identified himself as 6'4''.

To be fair, that's probably his "without shoes" height.  At the draft combine he was measured 6'4.75'' without shoes, but at the Nets combine he was measured at 6'3.75'' without shoes.

Any way you slice it, Crowder does not have ideal height for the wing.  His wingspan is alright though.
wow then Smart must be under 6'2


Smart measured 6'2'' without shoes at the combine.

Crowder seems taller than he is because of his hair.


Thomas really looks out of place trying to defend against starters.  This is why he doesn't start, guys.
I disagree. His offense is worth the dip on defense and he played pretty good D on George.

Re: Celtics (1-2) at Pacers (1-3) Game #4 11/4/15
« Reply #58 on: November 04, 2015, 07:25:25 PM »

Offline crimson_stallion

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5964
  • Tommy Points: 875
Celts look very small 1-3 with IT, Bradley, Crowder out there.  Nobody over 6'4''.
How tall is Crowder ?

Listed at 6'6'', but on the broadcast earlier in the season he identified himself as 6'4''.

To be fair, that's probably his "without shoes" height.  At the draft combine he was measured 6'4.75'' without shoes, but at the Nets combine he was measured at 6'3.75'' without shoes.

Any way you slice it, Crowder does not have ideal height for the wing.  His wingspan is alright though.

Sorry, posted before you wrote this!

But yeah, without shoes height is correct - though nobody ever really goes off that since everybody in the NBA plays with shoes on :)

Re: Celtics (1-2) at Pacers (1-3) Game #4 11/4/15
« Reply #59 on: November 04, 2015, 07:25:28 PM »

Online Neurotic Guy

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23404
  • Tommy Points: 2522
Kelly is a different player on both ends.