Sadly, for whatever reason, it seems that we're culturally programmed to blame the victim instead of focusing on the culpability of the attacker. This thread is a powerful example.
Why are we so intent on talking about why this woman didn't go to the police sooner? Why aren't we talking about why Derrick Rose might have done what he is accused of doing? If that's not a strong case for the existence of "rape culture," I don't know what is.
The victim is usually easier to blame, I guess, since victims have a tendency to lack power, individually and politically.
the idea of rape culture is a joke, first off, but that is all I will say on that subject.
Second of all, how can you insinuate I blamed the victim?
Because I said I have no idea how she didn't go to the police, she deserved to get raped? What kind of a jump in logic is that?
Here is the thing...I understand why someone like Rose would do something like this, because they are a sick, terrible individual who let fame and money go to his head, and think he can do whatever he wants with no consequences.
I do not understand (though have more of an understanding than I did) how on earth something this terrible could happen and someone wouldn't go to the police.
I would say it is very possible that D Rose did this, possibly even more possible than him not doing it.
But what now, he basically just has to pay her money? That isn't justice. How is money going to fix what happened to her emotionally?
Real justice would be him being arrested and charged with this, but that can't happen because it wasn't reported.
It is like you are mad that things are underreported and underprosectured, but yet when someone says "maybe going to the police sooner could help with both of those things" you say they simply don't understand.
It is very difficult to wrap my head around