I hated the Joe Johnson and Potapenko trade.
it was awful... we dumped JJ AND billups for NOTHING. we could have a had a team with PP, JJ, billups, and walker... that would have been interesting.
and bias and lewis dying in the 10-15 years before... amazing how the fortunes of the franchise turned downward.
Revisionist history.
The Billups deal was a good one. Billups sucked for years. No way Boston fans would have waited the 4-5 years before he started showing he belonged in the league. Disagree? Take a look at the fanbase ready to dump Young after a year and he's shown more than Billups did his rookie year. We didn't get nothing either. We got Kenny Anderson. While he wasn't the stud he was early in his career in NJ, he was the vet PG we needed to keep the ball out of Antoine's hands the majority of the time.
The JJ deal was bad for 2 reasons.
1. Anyone watching JJ and Kedrick that year had to see the difference in talent from the get go. Brown is the one that should have gone --> didn't show anything but athleticism. JJ showed he actually had some skills.
2. Getting Rogers and Delk that year helped propel that team into the playoffs where they got as far as the Nets series. The problem was that we didn't resign Rogers to make the deal really worth making and it necessitated the Vin Baker deal which bombed on us.
A team with Anderson, JJ, PP, Antoine, Rogers on the floor would have given the Nets fits. add in the rest of the bench crew and we would have had a better chance against them. Not saying we would have won but having JJ off the bench instead of Brown would have been an improvement.