I figured that someone would bring up the 13-14 season, and that's fine . Fair enough. However, while you're right about having to play against mostly western conference starters that year, I think it's also important to point out that IT played with far more talent in Sacramento in Cousins (who, alone makes my point ), Rudy Gay (after he was traded there from Toronto in the December of 2013), and even Marcus Thornton, than what Irving had in Cleveland, meaning that the defense was always geared to stop him.
Or on the other hand, the fact that Irving played with less talent meant that he was always the undisputed #1 option, which means the ball was always in his hand and his usage rate was always going to be sky high.
As opposed to Thomas, who was a third option behind Cousins and Gay (yet was still able to put up huge numbers).
I thought that I implied that. Oops. Sorry for the confusion. I know that 'usage rate' is, well, used a lot around here, but I'm not familiar with what it is, exactly. Is it a measure of how often and for how long a player has the ball or something?
Again, I'm not saying that IT is a bad player, but I think he's really being overrated here. As for being the third option on that Sacramento team, I was trying to say that the shots he would have gotten would have been better than Irving's, meaning that it was more likely for him to shoot a better percentage. Am I making any sense, here?
Overrated? The fact he still put up those numbers playing behind Cousins and Gay, make underrated if anything. It is interesting though, that Thomas and Irving are so close in numbers despite Irving being an all star.