Others have gone to some length to explain why we believe that the signings of Amir and Lee don't necessarily indicate a lack of prioritizing youth development.
Just because you've attempted to argue your position at length doesn't make it the correct position.
Sure, but the quoted post seemed to indicate that I had not supported the claim in my original post, which I don't think is right at all.
I think I've made my reasons pretty clear for thinking that trading for Lee and acquiring Amir have nothing to do with developing youth and signal that developing youth is at best one of a handful of top priorities for the team currently.