Author Topic: Sign And Trade Bass to LAC?  (Read 1312 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Sign And Trade Bass to LAC?
« on: July 04, 2015, 06:09:19 AM »

Offline ssspence

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6375
  • Tommy Points: 403
While I'm sure Doc will explore other options first (Koufos), one wonders if he might want to bring in Bass for, say, 2 years at $5mil per.

The trouble for the Cs: not a lot of tradable guys on LAC worth adding. They need to move a SG.  Crawford isn't really a fit, though he'd be an asset before this year's trade deadline. They probably won't give up Reddick. No interest in Stevenson or Rivers.

Other than that, not much to see here, unfortunately. Would be kinda fun to see a Thomas / Crawford backcourt for stretches, though.

Mike

(My name is not Mike)

Re: Sign And Trade Bass to LAC?
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2015, 06:32:42 AM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 36776
  • Tommy Points: 2961
Give throw Wallace in for free and Pressey while you re at it

Re: Sign And Trade Bass to LAC?
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2015, 07:09:06 AM »

Offline Fred Roberts

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1534
  • Tommy Points: 102
Good thought in general and tp on finding a home for Crash. Pressey will be good in Europe. Would Brooklyn have room to take crash back? They clearly are trying to sign players and win games. I don't mind Wallace, but he gets no pt under Brad.

Re: Sign And Trade Bass to LAC?
« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2015, 07:35:49 AM »

Offline BornReady

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 981
  • Tommy Points: 40
I think LAC should be worried more about the C rather than the PF.
As they are running out of options with wright, Monroe, Lopez and chandler already signing
Not to mention they don't have much cap space
There are not a lot of options

Re: Sign And Trade Bass to LAC?
« Reply #4 on: July 04, 2015, 08:25:30 AM »

Offline Robb

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1560
  • Tommy Points: 128
I think LAC should be worried more about the C rather than the PF.
As they are running out of options with wright, Monroe, Lopez and chandler already signing
Not to mention they don't have much cap space
There are not a lot of options

I like the idea a lot. They can play Blake more at the 5. Trade him for a pick that goes unprotected somewhere down the line.

Has the added benefit of putting more pressure on Blake and CP3 so that they could look to leave the team sometime in the future.
« Last Edit: July 04, 2015, 08:31:28 AM by Robb »
We're the ones we've been waiting for.