Author Topic: Our Depth Chart currently looks like:  (Read 5619 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Our Depth Chart currently looks like:
« Reply #15 on: July 03, 2015, 10:35:03 AM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
/
Bradley, unable to categorize.

Honestly, I forgot Bradley because I'm hoping he's gonna get traded and keep trying to think of a good trade scenario for getting rid of him.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Our Depth Chart currently looks like:
« Reply #16 on: July 03, 2015, 10:59:03 AM »

Offline CFAN38

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4885
  • Tommy Points: 421
this is my attempt to figure out this current rosters likelyP minutes breakdown

PG: Smart 19, IT 29

SG: AB 33, Turner 5, Smart 5, ?? 5 (battler for scraps between young, rozier and hunter, if young wins smart picks up 3 addition mpg at SG and Young gets 5mpg at SF )

SF: Turner 20, Crowder 25, Smart 3

PF: Sully 28, KO 18, Crowder 2

C : Johnson 25, Zeller 21, KO 2

Smart 27mog
Thomas 29mpg
AB       33 mpg
Turner 25 mpg
Crowder 27mpg
Sullinger 28 mpg
Olynyk  20 mpg
Johnson 25mpg
Zeller 21 mpg
Young/Hunter/Rozier 5mpg

This roster is not going to make life easy for BS. Jerebko should earn some PT but its hard to see where it will come from. The young guys will also likely push for playing time but barring an inury it looks difficult to find. 
Mavs
Wiz
Hornet

Re: Our Depth Chart currently looks like:
« Reply #17 on: July 03, 2015, 11:02:22 AM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 36889
  • Tommy Points: 2969
Trouble.

Re: Our Depth Chart currently looks like:
« Reply #18 on: July 03, 2015, 11:03:58 AM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 36889
  • Tommy Points: 2969
I thought it reads like his:

Too many undersized guards
Too many undersized power forwards
Too many mediocre players
Not big man.

LOL

TP !

Re: Our Depth Chart currently looks like:
« Reply #19 on: July 03, 2015, 11:05:16 AM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20000
  • Tommy Points: 1323
Hats off to the guys who ditched the traditional positions for CBS ones.

I think Sully will be traded folks, he was offered in every trade we had to different teams.   He can't spread the floor like our other bigs, and he plays poor defense and is ill suited to anything but a slug it out half court style.  Not to mention he is about as athletic as a guy at the YMCA.  Defintely our best rebounder, he has great hands a lot of his problems are mental.  Lazy, won't commit to D, thinks he is something he is not.  DA is shopping him, hard. 

I thought Bradley would be offered for a sign and trade but not yet.

Re: Our Depth Chart currently looks like:
« Reply #20 on: July 03, 2015, 11:05:26 AM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 36889
  • Tommy Points: 2969
More specifically

AOT




ABSENCE OF talent  :-[
« Last Edit: July 03, 2015, 01:02:45 PM by SHAQATTACK »

Re: Our Depth Chart currently looks like:
« Reply #21 on: July 03, 2015, 11:11:56 AM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
In Brad's terms is KO actually a big?

He's a blend between cannon fodder and kamikaze.
Kind of a mean thing to say about kamikazes. They were more effective both at achieving their objectives and at striking fear into opponents.

Re: Our Depth Chart currently looks like:
« Reply #22 on: July 03, 2015, 11:18:35 AM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
I think our depth chart looks a little like this:

At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Our Depth Chart currently looks like:
« Reply #23 on: July 03, 2015, 11:28:18 AM »

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17846
  • Tommy Points: 2666
  • bammokja
Our depth chart currently looks like:


cute, but not accurate. actually the celtics seem to have one of the deeper sets of players when counting the rotation as 4 (5?) through 12. lots of over lapping skills for switches and not a major drop off. lots of credible, but not outstanding players.

the problem is the TOP of the rotation not the bench, yes? this showed itself last season when the celtic bench often beat up other benches and took their lunch money.
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva

Re: Our Depth Chart currently looks like:
« Reply #24 on: July 03, 2015, 11:48:52 AM »

Offline TheTruthFot18

  • NCE
  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2125
  • Tommy Points: 263
  • Truth Juice
After the 3 signings:

pg: Smart, Thomas, Rozier
sg: Bradley, Young, Hunter
sf: Crowder, Turner, Wallace
pf: Johnson, Sully, Jerebko
c: Zeller, KO, Mickey

Except for Wallace and Young or Hunter all of those 2nd and 3rd string guys can get minutes. That means no one can really get above 30 minutes. If they do, someone will not be happy.

Even if you sit Mickey all year, sharing 96 minutes with 5 (maybe 6) guys just won't work at the 4-5. To a lesser extent the 1-2 with 5-6 guys filling those minutes.

1. Move Bradley to give Smart, Thomas, Rozier, Young/Hunter minutes.
2. Move KO/Sully to give Zeller, Johnson, Jerebko, Mickey, (KO/Sully) minutes.

I saw a suggestion of trading Wallace, Hunter, and a 1st or 2nd for Hibbert. Would still need more moves but I wouldn't mind Hibbert for that trade.
The Nets will finish with the worst record and the Celtics will end up with the 4th pick.

- Me (sometime in January)

--------------------------------------------------------

Guess I was wrong (May 23rd)

Re: Our Depth Chart currently looks like:
« Reply #25 on: July 03, 2015, 11:51:16 AM »

Offline TheTruthFot18

  • NCE
  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2125
  • Tommy Points: 263
  • Truth Juice
this is my attempt to figure out this current rosters likelyP minutes breakdown

PG: Smart 19, IT 29

SG: AB 33, Turner 5, Smart 5, ?? 5 (battler for scraps between young, rozier and hunter, if young wins smart picks up 3 addition mpg at SG and Young gets 5mpg at SF )

SF: Turner 20, Crowder 25, Smart 3

PF: Sully 28, KO 18, Crowder 2

C : Johnson 25, Zeller 21, KO 2

Smart 27mog
Thomas 29mpg
AB       33 mpg
Turner 25 mpg
Crowder 27mpg
Sullinger 28 mpg
Olynyk  20 mpg
Johnson 25mpg
Zeller 21 mpg
Young/Hunter/Rozier 5mpg

This roster is not going to make life easy for BS. Jerebko should earn some PT but its hard to see where it will come from. The young guys will also likely push for playing time but barring an inury it looks difficult to find.

Not to knock your prediction since mine wouldn't be much different but this can't be sustainable. Something has to give somewhere.
The Nets will finish with the worst record and the Celtics will end up with the 4th pick.

- Me (sometime in January)

--------------------------------------------------------

Guess I was wrong (May 23rd)

Re: Our Depth Chart currently looks like:
« Reply #26 on: July 03, 2015, 12:08:44 PM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20000
  • Tommy Points: 1323
KO is our enforcer/hatchet man

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZ31539Cg04

Re: Our Depth Chart currently looks like:
« Reply #27 on: July 03, 2015, 12:23:09 PM »

Offline Rosco917

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6108
  • Tommy Points: 559
Shortly it may be time to look at the rosters of other NBA teams, and see if we can't do a 2 for 1 trade, plus a draft pick, and grab a young center that can replace or help Zeller. A guy that can protect the rim and defend.

The Bucks come to mind they just got Monroe. There must be others teams that would like a young power forward with upside. Or a SG to come off the bench.     

Re: Our Depth Chart currently looks like:
« Reply #28 on: July 03, 2015, 12:46:31 PM »

Offline P stoff

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 200
  • Tommy Points: 31
As it stands the roster needs thinning. but thee is a big conflict IMO

If you traded AB and sully to acquire a center, then you have Zeller, JJ, AJ, new center,  KO
...someone is going to be unhappy in that 5-man for 4 spots rotation.

If you trade just Sully then you still have that issue plus too many guards

So you would almost have to trade 2 of AJ,Zeller, KO, Sully and Bradley to accomplish some balance.

So... now that Sac needs players back:

Smart, Sully, Zeller, Turner, Wallace,  + 2  picks   for Cousins/Gay  :)


IT, Bradley, Gay, KO, Cousins
Rozier, Young orHunter, Crowder, JJ, Johnson      Thornton, Iverson, Mickey

Re: Our Depth Chart currently looks like:
« Reply #29 on: July 03, 2015, 10:07:28 PM »

Offline Hemingway

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1181
  • Tommy Points: 123
Our depth chart looks about the same as last year except swap out Bass for Amir. Wallace and Pressey will likely be gone or not playing, Young should get more time tis year and maybe 1 or 2 of the rookies will earn time.

We have a lot of compitition. Afterall we resigned Jerebko and there are a lot of guys better than him already on the roster. Guys are going to have to fight it out and earn minutes here.

The questions right now are Crowder or Turner at the 3 and which 2 out of Sully, Amir and Zeller will play the 4 and 5.