Still he had a near tripple double game 5 and 6. Plus all season long was huge. Without Green you think they would of still won?
Look at the conversation.
I responded to someone claiming the finals raised his value. Yes, he was great all season long. But his finals were not great.
I do not think that any one series matters that much. Too small a sample size and matchups make it hard to gauge. But the logic of focusing on one game (as the earlier poster did with game 6) makes no sense in evaluating players.
Also, the "without player X would they have won" logic NEVER makes sense. In a sport where maybe 10 guys are in the rotation, most of them are essential to winning at the highest level. If we were to evaluate whether they would have won without him, we would also need to know the replacement player on the roster.