Logical Draft Day Trade: Bradley and 16th pick for Henderson and 9th pick

[ssspence]

If WCS is available at 9, I think this deal makes pretty clear sense for both parties. To me, this is the most likely move into the Top 10 for the Cs.

[Lucky17]

If WCS is available at 9, I think this deal makes pretty clear sense for both parties. To me, this is the most likely move into the Top 10 for the Cs.

But wouldn't Charlotte just take WCS at #9 and keep him?

[jay]

Between Sullinger, Bradley, James Young, and Danny's stockpile of draft picks, I wonder what it would take to aquire both the #6 pick and the #9 pick.

Stanley Johnson or Justice Winslow at 6

WCS or Myles Turner at 9

Throw in Marcus Smart and you have a pretty good trio to build around, Thomas would provide offense, maybe Olynyk would be a good pf option with this group.

[Chief Macho]

Has their been one credible report that has Avery being involved in any deal?   oh,  and wcs is not making it to pick 9.

[Cman]

Between Sullinger, Bradley, James Young, and Danny's stockpile of draft picks, I wonder what it would take to aquire both the #6 pick and the #9 pick.

Stanley Johnson or Justice Winslow at 6

WCS or Myles Turner at 9

Throw in Marcus Smart and you have a pretty good trio to build around, Thomas would provide offense, maybe Olynyk would be a good pf option with this group.

I'd much rather use draft picks to trade for a veteran.

[Evantime34]

I think we will try to move one of Sullinger or Olynyk long before we attempt to move Bradley.

Bradley didn't have the best year last year but he did shoulder the offensive load more than he has in the past. With the cap jumping next year, and (presumably) more talent around him to help him take more quality shots, I think his efficiency goes up and his trade value does too.

[ssspence]

If WCS is available at 9, I think this deal makes pretty clear sense for both parties. To me, this is the most likely move into the Top 10 for the Cs.

But wouldn't Charlotte just take WCS at #9 and keep him?

Charlotte needs 3 point shooting and depth at the 2 like a car needs wheels. I like Bradley -- not dying to give him up. But in doing this deal, Charlotte acquires two quality swing guys that fit clear, glaring team need (by taking the best of Hunter, Oubre, Looney, Johnson, whoever at 16, and getting Bradley in the process).

[BDeCosta26]

If WCS is available at 9, I think this deal makes pretty clear sense for both parties. To me, this is the most likely move into the Top 10 for the Cs.

But wouldn't Charlotte just take WCS at #9 and keep him?

All the reports say they're looking for shooting, not bigs. That could certainly not be true, but it makes sense. That team had serious spacing issues. Bradley would do well there, but if we do a deL with CHA I think they'll want Zeller to back up Big Al and draft Booker or Hunter at 16

[ThePoeticWolf]

If WCS is available at 9, I think this deal makes pretty clear sense for both parties. To me, this is the most likely move into the Top 10 for the Cs.

If WCS is there I rather just send them KO and the 16th for the 9th to draft WCS.  I don't want to get rid of Bradley since he's basically the team captain.  This way we could resign Sully who has more value to me then KO.

[ImShakHeIsShaq]

Because AB hasn't been in rumors, I prepared myself over the last week to accept that he will be shipped out. Danny usually does the deal with no leaks until it's already done. I am sad but dealing with it, if he isn't sent on his way it will be better to be relieved than caught off guard and have to be happy about his haul because I trust DA's work.

[PhoSita]

Bradley is probably the easiest to move for decent value because of his semi-reliable outside shot and his defensive reputation.  Teams in the top 10 that are interested in competing this upcoming year could use a decent role player with those qualities.

If somebody is traded in a draft-day move, it'll probably be Bradley, though Olynyk is a possibility as well.

[ssspence]

Just want to point out my intel on Hendo was good here,
for those of you who doubt my cred with sources. Just because he was traded doesn't mean Bradley won't end up there tomorrow. Stay tuned.

[chambers]

Just want to point out my intel on Hendo was good here,
for those of you who doubt my cred with sources. Just because he was traded doesn't mean Bradley won't end up there tomorrow. Stay tuned.

When did  you mention sources?
This was an idea of yours.
It doesn't involve us, doesn't involve any picks and involves Henderson. You buds with Chris Broussard ? I apologize on behalf of everyone who didn't give a Edited.  Profanity and masked profanity are against forum rules and may result in discipline..

[Eddie20]

Just want to point out my intel on Hendo was good here,
for those of you who doubt my cred with sources. Just because he was traded doesn't mean Bradley won't end up there tomorrow. Stay tuned.

Yeah, great intel. Too bad everyone knows that they've been trying to get rid of Henderson forever and out of the four assets you mentioned (Bradley, #9, #16, Henderson), Henderson is the worst.

[Jesus Shuttlesworth #20]

This is an impressive thread, it took only 12 hours to be 100% wrong, is that the record? Must be top 10 failed threads, couldn't even make it to draft day without being wrong haha.