Trade Avery + 28 for Morrow and #14

[alewilliam789]

I would do this in a heartbeat. I think OKC would easily be willing to give up Morrow, Augustin, and 14 for Bradley, Young, and 28 which is more than fair for me. Draft Myles Turner at 14 and then Sam Dekker at 16. Give Monroe the max.

PG: Marcus Smart
SG: Anthony Morrow
SF: Sam Dekker
PF: Myles Turner
C: Greg Monroe.

[Geo123]

OKC says no. Maybe if you swap out Morrow for Lamb or Waiters.

+1

[oldtype]

Avery alone should be enough for 14, there's no reason to throw in 28.

(I'm assuming that Morrow is basically zero-value. Maybe I'm wrong? If he isn't, we might as well ask for players they don't need instead since we wouldn't have much use for him.)

[Endless Paradise]

Morrow's arguably more valuable to OKC than Bradley is to the Celtics, so no, he's most definitely not "zero-value," at least to the Thunder.

That said, it'd be much more realistic to target Lamb or Waiters in a potential deal, like I said earlier.

[oldtype]

Morrow's arguably more valuable to OKC than Bradley is to the Celtics, so no, he's most definitely not "zero-value," at least to the Thunder.

That said, it'd be much more realistic to target Lamb or Waiters in a potential deal, like I said earlier.

Why are we even talking about him then. Like you said, just ask for whichever scrubs they don't need to make salaries match.

[Endless Paradise]

I have no idea. I think people just looked at the roster and assumed he must not be that important to OKC.

[vjcsmoke]

Don't want Morrow.  At age 29, he's not getting any better than what he is already.
#14 doesn't really interest me either.

Bradley is worth more than #14 all by himself because you're unlikely to get a better player at that position in the draft.

If we are talking about a top 11 pick, then maybe I'd consider throwing together a package of Bradley and a pick.