The other night Rivers shoved Smart into a pick and only got called for an offensive foul. Can't understand how the refs, after repeatedly watching the play, chose not to call it a flagrant foul. Smart got pulverized in the play.
Do you think the refs were doing Doc or the kid a favor? Or, were they that out of touch that they couldn't fathom that is was intentional and/or malicious? Either way it made me wonder how these refs think. Hopefully, the NBA saw this and explained to the refs that it was a poor decision.