Just curious for the Reggie Jackson fans out there -- what does he bring that Evan Turner hasn't brought this year? He scores more, but he seems to shoot more (which also seems to be why OKC is willing to move on). A bit better at free throws, although Turner gets to the line at a higher rate, but worse at 3-pointers, and passing is a bit of a wash (fewer assists but fewer turnovers). They get to the rim at about the same rate and shoot roughly the same percentage when they get there (which happens to be a little worse than the much-maligned Bradley). But say we got Jackson to run the point -- how much better would this team be, if at all? It's fine for people here to want to exile Bradley, but Jackson wouldn't be stepping into Bradley's role, he'd be stepping into Turner's.
My point isn't to say that Turner is amazing. But he's been serviceable, and is under contract next year at a bargain rate for his production -- how does Jackson get us that giant step forward we need, if he's largely going to take Turner's role on the team?