Again, the evidence is incredibly flimsy and circumstantial at best. And, again, it really only looks incriminating if you start with the assumption that someone intentionally deflated the balls and work from there, picking information out of context that only fits that theory.
For what the patriots are accused of, and given how much information the league had access to, if guilty, its actually incredible that there isn't MORE "evidence" of wrongdoing. The trick of the Wells report is that it takes all these random texts from thousands of texts from months apart at a time, and strips them of timing and context and puts them artificially together as evidence. But it only looks like evidence if you start with the conclusion set in stone.
Given how much these guys text and how freely they talk (texting insults about brady, etc), if there were an ongoing elaborate scheme, wouldn't you expect MORE evidence of illegality, especially if you could take texts out of context from any time?
it would be fun to look at the phones of two frequent texters, pick a crime, and try to dig texts from random times and different contexts to "prove" the crime. Again, if you are actually reading the texts without a foregone conclusion, the LACK of evidence is astounding.
In fact, if you were actually doing a non-biased search for deflation, you actually find that the best, most relevant and most explicit evidence shows that brady requested the balls NOT be 15-16 psi (illegally firm), and requests that they be 12.5 psi... WHICH IS LEGAL!
This is the amazing mind boggling thing. The texts ACTUALLY HAVE THE BEST EVIDENCE OF FULLY LEGAL BEHAVIOR!!!! THE ONLY MENTIONS OF PSI ARE FOR LEGAL LEVELS!