For those who say that the Clippers won't offer Jordan match because they need the money to fill out there bench, if they let Jordan walk, they are still at 56M before team options on Crawford and Barnes. Assuming they pick up Crawford's option and decline Barnes, it puts them at about 61.5M
So they aren't getting much more than the tax-payer mid-level exception, so it makes no sense to let Jordan walk. You aren't getting a significant amount of room to build the bench and are sacrificing one of your top 3.
The only concern would be the tax threshold and paying the repeater tax. Given that Ballmer blew away estimates with his bid to guarantee himself the team, I don't think he is the type to be deterred by the tax.
I do agree with those that say that it doesn't hurt to try though. Make your best offer and then move on, if the answer is "No." I would be totally shocked, however, if he is not a Clipper next season.
I do think he is worth a max offer. Is he a complete, two-way player? No. However, he is a game changer on the defensive end and on the boards. He is an elite shot-blocker and an elite defensive rebounder and while, he is limited on the offensive end, he plays within those limitations. Unlike mediocre offensive players who take a lot of bad shots outside of their "zones", he knows his limitations and doesn't hurt the team going beyond them.