0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Mediocre as he is, KO is better than Stauskas. I'll pass.
Quote from: fantankerous on January 15, 2015, 04:57:23 PMMediocre as he is, KO is better than Stauskas. I'll pass.Perhaps now, but who has the higher ceiling? I'm not sure KO's is higher.
That being said, would you consider parting with Olynyk and a lesser asset for Stauskas? KO might not be the "high-level" player they're looking for, but he's a good stretch four to help spread the floor around Boogie. The frontcourt defense might be a concern, but it's not that great right now as it is.Would this be a feasible trade for both parties?
Fluid Bigs who can shoot like Olynyk don't grow on tree's in this league. No way do you give him up for Stauskas. You can find Stauskas and then some with your mid-to-late first round picks coming up. You can't always find 7 footers who can shoot like KO.
Quote from: jpotter33 on January 15, 2015, 04:53:22 PMThat being said, would you consider parting with Olynyk and a lesser asset for Stauskas? KO might not be the "high-level" player they're looking for, but he's a good stretch four to help spread the floor around Boogie. The frontcourt defense might be a concern, but it's not that great right now as it is.Would this be a feasible trade for both parties?I like it. I want to trade Olynyk for whatever good prospect / asset Ainge can get for him. Stauskas seems like a good option. I would do that.
Should note the article talks about the Kings looking for a "high-level" player. Olynyk is a backup in a weak frontcourt on a losing team... I'd be shocked if the Kings were remotely interested in anything we have to offer.