I think even if we keep Green and Bass at this point we will at least be a bottom 5 team.
agreed. I thought we were a bottom 5 team even with Rondo. the only reason we weren't at this point isn't because we were over performing but because Indy, Charlotte, Detroit and NY were underperforming
If New York is "underperforming" what is going to happen when they start shutting down Carmelo Anythony?
If Indiana is under performing, when do they turn it around? They have lost something like 9 out of 10 or worse?
Also how are the bottom teams in the west going to win games? Denver has a fine team but they have a really similar record to us. When they are playing Houston, Golden State, Clippers, OKC, Spurs, Mavericks every night where do the wins come from?
I wish everyone on here would be identify the flaws and issues facing other teams as much as they focus on the celtics shortcomings. We are very very very far from a lock for bottom 5.
agree with you 100%.
I just can't see us being better than a New York team with Carmelo Anthony.
They haven't shut him down yet, and they are becoming more familiar with the triangle.
The Pacers have slightly underperformed with David West's injury. He's basically their 2nd best player behind Hibbert and they haven't had him for months until last week.
In fact they've been without George Hill for over a month and David West just got back after 2 months out.
A team of
George Hill PG
Rodney Stuckey SG
Solomon Hill SF
David West PF
Roy Hibbert C
Will beat our Celtics team if Green and Bass are gone.
They'll arguably beat us now without Rondo.
The Pistons are professionally tanking, but they are still a better team than us and if we do this tank professionally, we'll be worse after our roster is completely dismantled.
I'm not sure how we finish higher than the Knicks, Pacers, Pistons, Lakers, Jazz with a starting line up of
Smart
Bradley
Turner
Sully
Zeller.
Our awesome bench unit of:
Olynk
Wright
Young
Thornton (if he's not traded)
Crowder