No. Not yet.
Give him two years.
Give him 20 years and wait to win the super lotety...Does not have sense
In what part did I say 20 years?
You even quoted it. I said 2 years. I hate the Rondo trade, but you gotta admit, fleecing the Nets for picks and adding more is a great GM move.
What I'm saying is, here's 2 years, that's his window to now flip those assets and find a player we can build around. Either he lucks in the next two years in the draft, or pull a blockbuster deal that will give us a player we can make as the foundation of the new era, my point is, he has two years.
Getting that main piece should be an easy task with the assets we have. However long it takes to build around that guy is another problem for another day. But if he comes out empty in 2016, he needs to be sacked.
Sorry, but he had plenty of time to show managerial skills how he can keep the team in high level. Since he traded Perk, he should have prepare a strategy for rebuilding but unfortunately he failed. He failed in all aspects. Show me how many good players he developed? See the Spurs model and think how incompetent is our GM..
Dude, first of all theres no one like the Spurs. Okay? They are on a different level. You compare them to anyone, it isnt fair.
Second, the Perk trade was actually good. If Shaq or JO stayed healthy, we would have a championship team right there.
Third. He is hit and miss, but most of his hits were homeruns. Or have you forgotten he's the architect of Banner 17? How about turning scraps into assets?
Show you how many good players he developed? I can't, he's not the coach. He's not the guy who develops talent. He finds talent, and he's got a decent result in doing so.
He earned two extra years for me IMO gaining a ton of assets (not including the Rondo garbage haul). If he turns that into what we need, he stays. If he can't, he should go.
