I'
The cap space Boston would be giving up is more valuable than McGee is.
So for me it's no deal.
What if Wallace was going out? Who has an almost identical contract.
I wouldn't do it without including GW.
Yeah, that is definitely worth considering. I am not sure where I come down on it though.
On one hand, McGee is a much more useful piece to have given Boston's lack of a center. On the other hand, I worry about how disruptive McGee would be and how much he may harm the development of younger players & team spirit.
Actually, I'd still pass on McGee. Too much trouble. Boston does not have the veteran leadership required to keep him in check. Just too much trouble.
I'd swap Wallace for McGee in a heartbeat.
Don't think Denver sees any reason to do that deal.
As for a lack of vet presence to keep McGee in check...
I don't think that's what the kid needs. I think he needs a coach who can work him into a role and minimize his weaknesses. Case in point the defensive scheme built around Big Al's weaknesses.
McGee would also benefit from rondo's orchestration. Some easy feeds for thundering dunks would do more to keep him engaged and eager to work to stay on the floor would do more for his game than any vet screaming in his ear.
If he could be acquired for penuts I don't care about his salary.
There's like 2-3 marquee big man FA's next summer. LMA, Gassol and Monroe.
LMA is not a defensive shot blocker type
Monroe is breaking out but not the defender shot blocker type
Gassol is big time (remember back when he came in to the leage he was roundly dismissed as the totaly inferior Gassol, shows what we know) But he's unlikely to leave the griz.
So McGee's contract isn't that disabling. He's a FA in 2017 and we can go play with Wic's money then.
As an aside, big al is in the top 5 in blocked shots. How did that happen?