That was before a greatly improved Clippers team. That was BEFORE improved Warrior and Rockets teams!! Did I mention the improving Suns and Mavs teams??? The West is NOT the same as it was years ago.
Smitty77
I'm not really sure what this has to do with anything. You realize they were in the WCF this past season, but unfortunately, they had to deal with an injury in the playoffs for the second year in a row, right?
OKC will be fine.
Basically:
The injury is 6-8 weeks. By the time Rondo and Green return from injury they will probably have about 4 weeks to make up for the years that Durant and Westbrook had of perfecting the system OKC has in place.
The idea is pie in the sky and not what a rational GM would do when trying to set a team up for sustained success. Have we also forgotten Rondo is 28 and Green is 30, to Westbrook's 25?
(Green's actually also 28)
But TP
Have we forgotten to notice that something is missing and keeping OKC from getting over the top and winning a title?
Smitty77
Yeah, it's called good health. Unless you want to assert that Westbrook's injury in the 2013 playoffs and Ibaka's injury in the 2014 playoffs have nothing to do with it.
(They do. They've won 119 games since their Finals appearance and the first and second seed, respectively. They've been primed for success.)
It might not be though. Foot injuries can be problematic.
So that's why you wait to see how he responds. You don't just say, "oh man, KD could potentially end up having a chronic issue, let's just trade away Westbrook!"
OKC's whole tenet has been "patience and sustainability." All of these trades are the exact opposite of that.
Also, you're ignoring that Rondo has yet to show he's fully recovered from his injury. At least Westbrook managed to play in the playoffs AND be OKC's best player. Why exactly is OKC going to gamble on Rondo? Because KD's injured right now? Yeah, I don't follow.