0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It's kind of surprising to see that the Pacers aren't going after him, and didn't pursue Aaron Brooks, who they should have signed in the lockout season. He would have been perfect for them. Certainly better than George Hill.
Quote from: Beat LA on July 22, 2014, 09:55:44 PMIt's kind of surprising to see that the Pacers aren't going after him, and didn't pursue Aaron Brooks, who they should have signed in the lockout season. He would have been perfect for them. Certainly better than George Hill.Yeah, I was sure the Pacers would sign Brooks. They desperately need another PG. Hill is mediocre at best and they have no decent backup.
Quote from: hpantazo on July 22, 2014, 10:05:55 PMQuote from: Beat LA on July 22, 2014, 09:55:44 PMIt's kind of surprising to see that the Pacers aren't going after him, and didn't pursue Aaron Brooks, who they should have signed in the lockout season. He would have been perfect for them. Certainly better than George Hill.Yeah, I was sure the Pacers would sign Brooks. They desperately need another PG. Hill is mediocre at best and they have no decent backup. They just got Stuckey right?