The assumption that having a dad who is an NBA general manager (president of player affairs orwhatever his "real" title is) would help him get an NBA job is a much safer assumption than the idea that he would still be a top 10 pick if he had come out three years later.
Do you think Austin Ainge got more out of his career from his BYU diploma, or from the name on the back of the jersey?
Austin Ainge is just one example, and yes I think his degree and the education that came with that has played a part in his ascent in the Celtics organization.
I'm surprised you think Austin made a wise decision to go pro when he did considering he has been called a bust by many during the past two years and is in danger of being cut, but I guess we can agree to disagree.
Well, he's made $4.6 million more than he would've had he stayed in college the past two years and is guaranteed at least another $2.4 million on top of that. He's also improved considerably from his horrible rookie year and may very well manage to stick around in the league if he continues on this upward trajectory. Looks like he bet right to me.
Exactly. Rivers was/is probably never going to be considered a world beater, especially not when the "small guard" position is so crowded, and his draft stock was probably never going to be higher than when he declared, which is why he declared. You declare for the draft when you'll make the most money.
Does he go top 10 if he declares in 2013? Maybe. Does he go top 10 if he declares in 2014? Probably not. Does three years as a "student-athlete" at Duke really make that much more of a difference--aside from the number of wealthy coeds he'd have carnal access to and the amount of money the NCAA would make, of which he would receive exactly none? Meh.