If I am not mistaken the Sully Olynyk duo was pretty effective, at least on offense, last season.
Rondo / Smart
Bradley / Thornton
Green / Wallace
Sullinger / Bass
Olynyk / Zeller
11th man: Young
That is actually a fairly balanced roster. They could win 41 games if healthy.
Certainly they still need a starting center, an upgrade in 3 point shooting, and a star player that can finish games.
30-win team at best...
I'm not going to assert that this is a great, deep-playoff team or anything silly like that.
But do you really think that team is no better than 5 games better than last year's team?
Right off the bat, this roster is far more balanced than last year's was, with a true starting point guard (and better point guard depth) and a true center. Zeller is not to be confused with an all-start, but he's a legit quality center and that's huge improvement over last year.
We also should have much better size match ups all around, not having to play 6' 9" at the C and no Bayless playing SG so much (that was a killer defensively).
For the first time in two seasons we will start the year with BOTH Bradley and Rondo healthy. Is it too much to hope that we'll finally get a full season of those two playing together?
The youngsters should all be more experienced individually as well as within Steven's system. That's got to help at least a tiny bit, don't you think?
Finally, on top of those things, there is the intangible that Rondo and Green, who are arguably our two best players right now, are both healthy to start the season and will be in contract years.
You can argue that each of these effects may be small, but I'd like to think that they all add up to a little more than just +5 wins over last year's purposeful wreck of a season.
Though, to amend the above proposal by Mr. October, I expect Zeller to be the starting C and Sully & Olynyk to trade starts at PF until one of them firmly establishes himself as the starter.