One thing I'd just toss into the conversation is something that Jeff brought up on the front page yesterday. I totally don't buy the idea that acquiring Love is putting us more on the path of becoming the Miami Heat than the San Antonio Spurs.
First, this notion that the Spurs are a team without superstars is absurd. Tim Duncan is a top 10 player of all time, and potentially a top 5 player depending on who you ask. And while he's playing less, if you check out his per 36 minutes averages, he's doing exactly what he's always done throughout his career when he's on the floor. He's flanked by two other star caliber players in Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili--and that's not even bringing Kawhi Leonard into the conversation. This is not some reincarnation of the 2004 Pistons.
Second, the notion that the Spurs would never move homegrown assets for superstars is negated by the fact they lucked into Tim Duncan in 1997. If the C's had lucked into the #1 pick in 2007 or this year, they wouldn't have brought in KG and Ray and they wouldn't be looking to acquire Love now.
Finally, while I don't particularly like the Heat, is becoming them so bad? They've been to the past four Finals and have won two of them. If that's the "negative" of acquiring Love, I'll take it.