here's a fun bit from Grantland:
When it gets complicated is when both sides feed off each other. When the rational people from the first group feel the need to frame all of their arguments as a response to the crazy people in the second group, and the haters in the second group use it all as proof that LeBron?s the most overhyped athlete of his generation.
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/love-and-hate-in-the-lebron-era/
You don't think that article was a little pro-Lebron biased?
1st group = people who love Lebron = rational people
2nd group = people who don't love Lebron = haters, idiots, wrong
I am not a Lebron fan. I find him to be the best player currently playing basketball on this planet. He will go down as an All-time great. But to think he and his game are unapproachable from criticism as this writer on Grantland says goes a little over the line the other way, don't you think?