No giving up a first for (the expiring and expensive) Asik. We can likely use that in some better deal.
I'm not too sure if he is a guy we will want to have. It seems there will be lots of FA and trade available centers the next two years.
I really doubt there will be other centers as good as Asik available in the next couple years for anywhere near just a mid first rounder.
And, while Asik will be making a lot of money, his cap hit will be much smaller, which is more important from the basketball side (and luxury tax side), plus, on a one year deal, he won't be making much more than market value for a quality starting center.
I think drafting a guy for a trade that can't be completed until a week or two later is exceptionally rare.
It would make more sense to me if it was Asik for the TE, the Clips pick and the Philly pick.
Someone help me out here. Why couldn’t the trade be completed until a week or two after the draft?
Well, the short answer is because if they wait until the new season, which starts in July, then the C's, who are right up against the luxury tax right now, but will be well below it next season, will not have to pay the luxury tax for this year.
Of course, its more complicated than that, because there is also a hard cap that the C's can't go past, and they would if they aquired Asik without sending additional salary this year, but that isn't even relevant, because we know the C's wouldn't go into the tax in this instance anyways.