Trade Idea: Bos/GSW

[RJ87]

Thompson has by far more value around the league than anyone on our roster save for Rondo (and that's probably close given their respective ages and contracts).  The idea that we could get Thompson without giving up either Rondo or multiple first rounders is laughable.

I like Thompson quite a bit, but I think that's overvaluing him. I'm not sure I'd give up multiple 1st's with the current CBA for any player unless we're talking about a superstar.

I think Bradley + the 2014 BKN/ATL 1st + a 2nd rounder could be reasonable. Maybe I'd consider allowing them the additional option of swapping another 1st in a draft down the line, but I'd be extremely hesitant to give up two 1st's outright.

[Timdawgg]

Man Bass to GS makes a ton of sense..He would be perfect on that team...I don't know what we get back but bass seems to be a real nice fit for them..

[Kane3387]

Thompson has by far more value around the league than anyone on our roster save for Rondo (and that's probably close given their respective ages and contracts).  The idea that we could get Thompson without giving up either Rondo or multiple first rounders is laughable.

I like Thompson quite a bit, but I think that's overvaluing him. I'm not sure I'd give up multiple 1st's with the current CBA for any player unless we're talking about a superstar.

I think Bradley + the 2014 BKN/ATL 1st + a 2nd rounder could be reasonable. Maybe I'd consider allowing them the additional option of swapping another 1st in a draft down the line, but I'd be extremely hesitant to give up two 1st's outright.

GS was talking to okc about Thompson for harden. We're not getting klay without moving something substantial.

[Dog_Lover106]

Thompson has by far more value around the league than anyone on our roster save for Rondo (and that's probably close given their respective ages and contracts).  The idea that we could get Thompson without giving up either Rondo or multiple first rounders is laughable.

Thank you for your sane perspective. I realize that this is just a discussion board meant to kick things around a bit, but some of these trade ideas are just ridiculous.

[RJ87]

Thompson has by far more value around the league than anyone on our roster save for Rondo (and that's probably close given their respective ages and contracts).  The idea that we could get Thompson without giving up either Rondo or multiple first rounders is laughable.

I like Thompson quite a bit, but I think that's overvaluing him. I'm not sure I'd give up multiple 1st's with the current CBA for any player unless we're talking about a superstar.

I think Bradley + the 2014 BKN/ATL 1st + a 2nd rounder could be reasonable. Maybe I'd consider allowing them the additional option of swapping another 1st in a draft down the line, but I'd be extremely hesitant to give up two 1st's outright.

GS was talking to okc about Thompson for harden. We're not getting klay without moving something substantial.

Fair enough. But the extent of those talks will never be really known so I'm not sure that's a good basis for what his value really is (reportedly GSW wanted to dump Biedrins or Jefferson's contract in a deal).

Given they're supposed interest in Bass would anyone consider:

GSW gets: Bass, Bradley, the BKN/ATL 2014 1st, the LAC 2015 first, and the Nets 2016 1st (Top 5 protected)

Bos gets: Thompson, Speights, Nedovic (salary filler)

[RJ87]

Thompson has by far more value around the league than anyone on our roster save for Rondo (and that's probably close given their respective ages and contracts).  The idea that we could get Thompson without giving up either Rondo or multiple first rounders is laughable.

Thank you for your sane perspective. I realize that this is just a discussion board meant to kick things around a bit, but some of these trade ideas are just ridiculous.

Thank you for the condescending reply, obviously I'm just kicking the tires and was looking for a little debate. I've seen far more outlandish trade ideas (MKG for Bass or anything involving Gerald Wallace). Even with Bradley's less than impressive offense, his reputation as a defender hold some form of value. I don't think it's that ridiculous that a team in need of defense might be interested in acquiring him as part of trade package.

[Dog_Lover106]

Thompson has by far more value around the league than anyone on our roster save for Rondo (and that's probably close given their respective ages and contracts).  The idea that we could get Thompson without giving up either Rondo or multiple first rounders is laughable.

Thank you for your sane perspective. I realize that this is just a discussion board meant to kick things around a bit, but some of these trade ideas are just ridiculous.

Thank you for the condescending reply, obviously I'm just kicking the tires and was looking for a little debate. I've seen far more outlandish trade ideas (MKG for Bass or anything involving Gerald Wallace). Even with Bradley's less than impressive offense, his reputation as a defender hold some form of value. I don't think it's that ridiculous that a team in need of defense might be interested in acquiring him as part of trade package.

Are you saying that "just kicking the tires" means you were not being serious? If you are just looking for debate, here is mine.

GS might be interesting in acquiring Bradley, I would have no way of knowing that. But they are not sending Klay Thompson to the Celtics unless you give them Rondo and or Sullinger and multiple picks. 

You are correct however in suggesting that there have been far more outlandish trade ideas posted here.