Author Topic: Rockets (24-14) at Celtics (13-25) Game #39 1/13/14  (Read 33189 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Rockets (24-14) at Celtics (13-25) Game #39 1/13/14
« Reply #165 on: January 13, 2014, 11:11:39 PM »

Offline letsgoblue86

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3620
  • Tommy Points: 279
Bradley has to attempt 23 shots and only score 24 points?  With 11 made field goals.  11 made field goals for LeBron= 40 points. 

Not efficient. 

Re: Rockets (24-14) at Celtics (13-25) Game #39 1/13/14
« Reply #166 on: January 13, 2014, 11:16:06 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Bradley has to attempt 23 shots and only score 24 points?  With 11 made field goals.  11 made field goals for LeBron= 40 points. 

Not efficient.

no and 1's or many threes

Re: Rockets (24-14) at Celtics (13-25) Game #39 1/13/14
« Reply #167 on: January 13, 2014, 11:57:21 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30859
  • Tommy Points: 1327
Bradley has to attempt 23 shots and only score 24 points?  With 11 made field goals.  11 made field goals for LeBron= 40 points. 

Not efficient.
23 shots 0 ftas and 1 TO for 24 points.

Not inefficient by any means at all. Best on our team other than Bayless.

FTAs are used up possessions as well as are TOs.

Re: Rockets (24-14) at Celtics (13-25) Game #39 1/13/14
« Reply #168 on: January 14, 2014, 12:25:05 AM »

Offline LatterDayCelticsfan

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2195
  • Tommy Points: 171
  • Community Text
Lets just say we miss the Avery Bradley back door cut. Probably more efficient that the mid range and generated ftas. Number crunchers please test my hypothesis.
Banner 18 please 😍

Re: Rockets (24-14) at Celtics (13-25) Game #39 1/13/14
« Reply #169 on: January 14, 2014, 04:30:42 AM »

Offline ImShakHeIsShaq

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7739
  • Tommy Points: 804
Bradley has to attempt 23 shots and only score 24 points?  With 11 made field goals.  11 made field goals for LeBron= 40 points. 

Not efficient.
23 shots 0 ftas and 1 TO for 24 points.

Not inefficient by any means at all. Best on our team other than Bayless.

FTAs are used up possessions as well as are TOs.


December and January AB has taken around 14 shots per and scored 17pts per. I don't know about you guys but I think I'll give him a break for tonight. Not only that but it's not like anyone else (besides Bay who got hot in the 4th) was doing anything. Not only did he score 24pts, 5rbs, 3ast he put the clamps on Harden who had only 16pts (6-18), 7rbs, 3ast!

I mean LeBron is a monster who over the same time span took around 17 shots per and scored 27pts (about 7fts a game too while AB takes 2).
It takes me 3hrs to get to Miami and 1hr to get to Orlando... but I *SPIT* on their NBA teams! "Bless God and bless the (Celts)"-Lady GaGa (she said gays but she really meant Celts)

Re: Rockets (24-14) at Celtics (13-25) Game #39 1/13/14
« Reply #170 on: January 14, 2014, 07:32:48 AM »

Offline Boston Garden Leprechaun

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18464
  • Tommy Points: 1550
Bradley has to attempt 23 shots and only score 24 points?  With 11 made field goals.  11 made field goals for LeBron= 40 points. 

Not efficient.

volume scorer like Melo?  ;D
LET'S GO CELTICS!

Re: Rockets (24-14) at Celtics (13-25) Game #39 1/13/14
« Reply #171 on: January 14, 2014, 07:41:28 AM »

Offline PAOBoston

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8098
  • Tommy Points: 533
I would (should) be p---ed at Bradley for jacking up 24 shots and being very inefficient but then I realize he plays on a team that doesn't have a legitimate go to scorer so he's basically forced to shoot/try and score. I think in a perfect world, he's a very, very solid role player. Defends well and with his development this year, can shoot the ball from distance. Those 2 things can keep him in the league for a long time. Unfortunately, the C's are constructed in a way which forced him to be more of a go-to guy than a complimentary piece.

Re: Rockets (24-14) at Celtics (13-25) Game #39 1/13/14
« Reply #172 on: January 14, 2014, 08:51:37 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30859
  • Tommy Points: 1327
I would (should) be p---ed at Bradley for jacking up 24 shots and being very inefficient
Here's the thing, 1 PPP isn't "very inefficient".

BTW it appears the final line is 21 shots and 0 FTAs to get  24 points and 1 turnover. That's a TS% of .571 and ORTG of 116.

Bradley and Bayless were the only players keeping us in the game.

Re: Rockets (24-14) at Celtics (13-25) Game #39 1/13/14
« Reply #173 on: January 14, 2014, 01:03:00 PM »

Offline ImShakHeIsShaq

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7739
  • Tommy Points: 804
I would (should) be p---ed at Bradley for jacking up 24 shots and being very inefficient
Here's the thing, 1 PPP isn't "very inefficient".

BTW it appears the final line is 21 shots and 0 FTAs to get  24 points and 1 turnover. That's a TS% of .571 and ORTG of 116.

Bradley and Bayless were the only players keeping us in the game.

Maybe Green shoulda kept shooting. 0.0
It takes me 3hrs to get to Miami and 1hr to get to Orlando... but I *SPIT* on their NBA teams! "Bless God and bless the (Celts)"-Lady GaGa (she said gays but she really meant Celts)

Re: Rockets (24-14) at Celtics (13-25) Game #39 1/13/14
« Reply #174 on: January 14, 2014, 06:05:30 PM »

Offline Boston Garden Leprechaun

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18464
  • Tommy Points: 1550
AB the next MELO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;D
LET'S GO CELTICS!

Re: Rockets (24-14) at Celtics (13-25) Game #39 1/13/14
« Reply #175 on: January 14, 2014, 06:47:52 PM »

Online SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 36776
  • Tommy Points: 2961
I was a bit disappointed in my Duke man Jabari Parker.   I was looking for him to break bad on UVA .last night........ I hoped he'd have a Pierce like game .......even though Duke won.


Yeah,     Sad deal here .......no center .....is not working.