Author Topic: Bucks (3-13) at Celtics (7-12) Game #20 12/3  (Read 38360 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Bucks (3-13) at Celtics (7-12) Game #20 12/3
« Reply #195 on: December 03, 2013, 10:22:59 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14456
  • Tommy Points: 972
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
Hump had a good 20 minutes.

8 rebounds, 5 points, 3 assists, 2 fouls, some good defense.
« Last Edit: December 03, 2013, 10:28:21 PM by Surferdad »

Re: Bucks (3-13) at Celtics (7-12) Game #20 12/3
« Reply #196 on: December 03, 2013, 10:24:10 PM »

Offline Boston Garden Leprechaun

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18464
  • Tommy Points: 1550
Just have always hated Bucks .......when Ray Allen was there especially

i hated them when they had sidney moncrief, paul pressey, randy breuer, etc.

oh and i almost forgot ricky pierce.  >:(
Grest sixth man, and Terry Cummings.

ahh yes, terry. i hated that team. really.
LET'S GO CELTICS!

Re: Bucks (3-13) at Celtics (7-12) Game #20 12/3
« Reply #197 on: December 03, 2013, 10:26:32 PM »

Offline jdz101

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3171
  • Tommy Points: 404


how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck was chris bosh?

Re: Bucks (3-13) at Celtics (7-12) Game #20 12/3
« Reply #198 on: December 03, 2013, 10:37:04 PM »

Offline pokeKingCurtis

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3733
  • Tommy Points: 280


Builds team for 4th seed, wins a championship?

Re: Bucks (3-13) at Celtics (7-12) Game #20 12/3
« Reply #199 on: December 03, 2013, 11:13:05 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867


Builds team for 4th seed, wins a championship?

If that happens you have will see stevens picture next to Einstein pictures

Re: Bucks (3-13) at Celtics (7-12) Game #20 12/3
« Reply #200 on: December 03, 2013, 11:20:02 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
Just have always hated Bucks .......when Ray Allen was there especially

i hated them when they had sidney moncrief, paul pressey, randy breuer, etc.

  Moncreif was tough to hate, so was Marques Johnson. Other than that I haven't like the Bucks since Oscar was there.

  In terms of the game, I liked some of the heady plays near the end. Sully making the pass from outside the arc and running in to tip in a missed shot, Sully with the cross-court pass to Green, who swung the ball to AB for the three. They then had that horrible 24 second violation, but those are the ups and downs of young(ish) players.

Re: Bucks (3-13) at Celtics (7-12) Game #20 12/3
« Reply #201 on: December 04, 2013, 07:38:03 AM »

Offline DesertDweller

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 623
  • Tommy Points: 92
8-12 First place???  That's ugly but it matters not how we get 'er done!!!

I think the real question should be..."ARE THE NETS TANKING".

Re: Bucks (3-13) at Celtics (7-12) Game #20 12/3
« Reply #202 on: December 04, 2013, 09:13:11 AM »

Offline Boston Garden Leprechaun

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18464
  • Tommy Points: 1550
8-12 First place???  That's ugly but it matters not how we get 'er done!!!

I think the real question should be..."ARE THE NETS TANKING".

It was not in the nets' plans to tank i assure you after trading for PP and KG.
LET'S GO CELTICS!

Re: Bucks (3-13) at Celtics (7-12) Game #20 12/3
« Reply #203 on: December 05, 2013, 07:29:32 AM »

Offline DesertDweller

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 623
  • Tommy Points: 92
8-12 First place???  That's ugly but it matters not how we get 'er done!!!

I think the real question should be..."ARE THE NETS TANKING".

It was not in the nets' plans to tank i assure you after trading for PP and KG.

That's what's so baffling. Jason Kidd is in deep DO-DO. He's seems to be moving in one direction but it appears assistant coach Lawrence Frank and possibly the rest of the team are playing a different game. there seems to be too much conflict and until it stops this team will be in complete chaos!!!

Re: Bucks (3-13) at Celtics (7-12) Game #20 12/3
« Reply #204 on: December 05, 2013, 08:49:49 AM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31869
  • Tommy Points: 10047


Builds team for 4th seed, wins a championship?

If that happens you have will see stevens picture next to Einstein pictures
if we won a championship would anyone really complain though?  well, probably, can't make everyone happy

Re: Bucks (3-13) at Celtics (7-12) Game #20 12/3
« Reply #205 on: December 05, 2013, 09:17:56 AM »

Offline pokeKingCurtis

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3733
  • Tommy Points: 280


Builds team for 4th seed, wins a championship?

If that happens you have will see stevens picture next to Einstein pictures
if we won a championship would anyone really complain though?  well, probably, can't make everyone happy

SHOULD HAVE TANKED FOR WIGGINS, WOULD HAVE WON AT LEAST 2.

 ;)

Re: Bucks (3-13) at Celtics (7-12) Game #20 12/3
« Reply #206 on: December 05, 2013, 04:42:57 PM »

Offline Boston Garden Leprechaun

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18464
  • Tommy Points: 1550
8-12 First place???  That's ugly but it matters not how we get 'er done!!!

I think the real question should be..."ARE THE NETS TANKING".

It was not in the nets' plans to tank i assure you after trading for PP and KG.

That's what's so baffling. Jason Kidd is in deep DO-DO. He's seems to be moving in one direction but it appears assistant coach Lawrence Frank and possibly the rest of the team are playing a different game. there seems to be too much conflict and until it stops this team will be in complete chaos!!!

I really do not see what nets management saw in Kidd. I mean really? They could not find anybody better? SVG? JVG? I think Mike Fratello and Hubie Brown could come back and do better than Kidd.
LET'S GO CELTICS!

Re: Bucks (3-13) at Celtics (7-12) Game #20 12/3
« Reply #207 on: December 05, 2013, 05:03:06 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
8-12 First place???  That's ugly but it matters not how we get 'er done!!!

I think the real question should be..."ARE THE NETS TANKING".

It was not in the nets' plans to tank i assure you after trading for PP and KG.

That's what's so baffling. Jason Kidd is in deep DO-DO. He's seems to be moving in one direction but it appears assistant coach Lawrence Frank and possibly the rest of the team are playing a different game. there seems to be too much conflict and until it stops this team will be in complete chaos!!!

I really do not see what nets management saw in Kidd. I mean really? They could not find anybody better? SVG? JVG? I think Mike Fratello and Hubie Brown could come back and do better than Kidd.
Lawrence Frank could probably do better than Kidd. It's beyond mind-boggling why you'd hire a coach with 0 (zero) experience at any level to coach a team that has an obvious window not exceeding 2 seasons.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Bucks (3-13) at Celtics (7-12) Game #20 12/3
« Reply #208 on: December 05, 2013, 05:20:12 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
8-12 First place???  That's ugly but it matters not how we get 'er done!!!

I think the real question should be..."ARE THE NETS TANKING".

It was not in the nets' plans to tank i assure you after trading for PP and KG.

That's what's so baffling. Jason Kidd is in deep DO-DO. He's seems to be moving in one direction but it appears assistant coach Lawrence Frank and possibly the rest of the team are playing a different game. there seems to be too much conflict and until it stops this team will be in complete chaos!!!

I really do not see what nets management saw in Kidd. I mean really? They could not find anybody better? SVG? JVG? I think Mike Fratello and Hubie Brown could come back and do better than Kidd.
Lawrence Frank could probably do better than Kidd. It's beyond mind-boggling why you'd hire a coach with 0 (zero) experience at any level to coach a team that has an obvious window not exceeding 2 seasons.

According to everything I've read, Frank was doing much more of the coaching than Kidd was.

If that's the case, then they're really demoting the guy who lead them to the 5-13 record, and giving the reigns to Kidd properly.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Bucks (3-13) at Celtics (7-12) Game #20 12/3
« Reply #209 on: December 05, 2013, 06:40:10 PM »

Offline Endless Paradise

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2853
  • Tommy Points: 182
Lawrence Frank could probably do better than Kidd. It's beyond mind-boggling why you'd hire a coach with 0 (zero) experience at any level to coach a team that has an obvious window not exceeding 2 seasons.

I don't know why people keep saying this.  The Nets didn't hire Kidd to oversee a team with a two-year window.  Kidd's hiring predated the Doc + KG for DeAndre Jordan trade talks, which were later shot down and resulted in the Nets trade over the summer.  He was hired to coach an entirely different roster (with much less pressure of winning immediately).  Pierce and KG weren't even in the cards for Brooklyn at the time.