I also don't really see the appeal in Asik, but that's just me. He had one season and has become obscenely overrated.
He was highly regarded before then, it's why he got such a big contract.
I like Asik but I'm not sure how he singlehandedly turns a team around. Seems like a guy who becomes more effective when he's got great talent around him, kinda like Tyson Chandler. No way we contend before his deal ends which means either letting him go or paying him even more to stay.
The reason he got such a contract is because this type of contract (similar to the one with Lin) made it impossible and impractical for the team who held the restricted free-agents right to match, since they'd have to pay excessively more to retain them than the team with the offer sheet.
3 years 24 million for a C of his quality is a normal NBA deal. Look at what Perkins got, and other Cs around the league since forever.
Its just the 5, 5, 15 aspect of it that is weird.
Right. Guy's 7ft+ and an excellent defender. That's what they get. If he could score, he'd earn a lot more.
I think MKG looks like a starter, far from a star. But I don't think I see Charlotte taking Wallace AND giving him up to get Asik.
I posted a related trade here:
http://forums.celticsblog.com/index.php?topic=68087.15a variation would be:
CHA gets: Asik, C Lee, one of (Garcia, Brewer or Brooks)
BOS gets: Gordon, Jeff Taylor, Greg Smith
HOU gets: B Bass, Jeff Green
It puts the Rockets right up against the lux tax, but not over it (it looks like). It makes some sense for each team.
==============================================================
footnote: the Cs aren't getting a Wallace deal where they send him out with a late 1st and get an expiring deal back. major pipe dream. no team is paying $20mil and crushing their cap for the next two seasons for a late 1st. if Chris Mannix said that, it confirms he's a tier two NBA reporter (at best).