I also don't really see the appeal in Asik, but that's just me. He had one season and has become obscenely overrated.
He was highly regarded before then, it's why he got such a big contract.
I like Asik but I'm not sure how he singlehandedly turns a team around. Seems like a guy who becomes more effective when he's got great talent around him, kinda like Tyson Chandler. No way we contend before his deal ends which means either letting him go or paying him even more to stay.
The reason he got such a contract is because this type of contract (similar to the one with Lin) made it impossible and impractical for the team who held the restricted free-agents right to match, since they'd have to pay excessively more to retain them than the team with the offer sheet.
3 years 24 million for a C of his quality is a normal NBA deal. Look at what Perkins got, and other Cs around the league since forever.
Its just the 5, 5, 15 aspect of it that is weird.
It was a 3 year deal for a player that was 2 years into the league and hadn't played more than 14 minutes a game when he signed the contract, averaging 3.1 points a game.
Sorry, but that's not normal and doesn't compare to the Perkins situation at all, not even close.
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't recall a player with that type of production, getting that few minutes of playing time getting this sort of contract.
Plus, no one in the league was really interested in giving him this type of contract, so this really wan't his market... I may be wrong, but that's what I recall about the situation.