what if we have traded kris humphries to another team while he averages double-double in that team,
and brandon bass really su cks hard that he can't even grab 6 rebounds above per game?
and we traded our best starting sf gerald wallace
then unfortunately jeff green gives you 15 points below only?
I don't think we can judge any trade of Humphries or Wallace on whether that trade makes us better this year or not. Our goals aren't really about winning in the short term, and neither Wallace nor Humphries is part of the long-term picture.
If we clear Wallace's contract and/or get something of value for Humphries' expiring contract, I would be pretty happy with that result.
we got some options trade bass contract to a contending team who they think will face heat bull brooklyn knicks or lakers houston spurs memphis golden state
if i'm a gm if humphries and wallace are not part of those rebuild just some filler to give away kg and pierce and terry to brooklyn, then i'll include bass humphries wallace
if all of us here believes that uncle jeff will be taking the place where paul pierce had left in boston, then so be it
besided trading humphries and wallace and bass gives us a descent players
so out starting pf is sullinger with the back-up of olynx or faverani, with those 3 trade players we can somehow acquire a descent center which will be our starter
and since we are stack up with shooting guards, i'd rather trade bogas marshoon as fillers too
in this case we can have a center + picks and maybe back-up point guard, then our SG is rotational lee bradley crawford, lee gives us height in some sg's moving forward
and pressey as the 3rd string PG