CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.

CelticsBlog ForumsCeltics BasketballCeltics TalkSimple Question: Is Doc a great coach?
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]   
Author Topic: Simple Question: Is Doc a great coach?  (Read 4218 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
BballTim
Dennis Johnson
******************

Tommy Points: 785
Offline Offline

Posts: 18084


Email
« Reply #90 on: February 28, 2013, 12:06:32 PM »

i do think is a much better playoff series coach than regular season
and i think that's because he plays strictly from matchups. and then of course, you play them more than once, you start to understand certain things

and whle we overachieved last year, i think, for a team with a broken PP, Ray, Steamer...we were close to ECF. I mean...we won 3.5 quarters of game 6. then something happened...I have no clue what. It just stopped.

but my point was even tho that happened, we went 6 games with a wack ATL and 7 with the sixers. smh.

i'd be a tinch happier if he utilized the talent before we had an opp to go sub500. i don't think team should've ever been sub 500 unless we lost our first game. we were, as constructed, easily 2 or 3...when Rondo goes down, 3-5. no reason we should be fighting for #7 but we are.

  There were various reasons that we were struggling (injuries, people missing rotations on defense, too many players with inconsistent roles/minutes) that would have eventually gone away, in fact most of them have already. Doc was coaching to get the team ready for the playoffs, not necessarily to win as many games as possible during the season.
Nothing to see here
kgainez
Kevin Garnett


Tommy Points: 30
Offline Offline

Posts: 760


Email
« Reply #91 on: February 28, 2013, 12:10:56 PM »

i do think is a much better playoff series coach than regular season
and i think that's because he plays strictly from matchups. and then of course, you play them more than once, you start to understand certain things

and whle we overachieved last year, i think, for a team with a broken PP, Ray, Steamer...we were close to ECF. I mean...we won 3.5 quarters of game 6. then something happened...I have no clue what. It just stopped.

but my point was even tho that happened, we went 6 games with a wack ATL and 7 with the sixers. smh.

i'd be a tinch happier if he utilized the talent before we had an opp to go sub500. i don't think team should've ever been sub 500 unless we lost our first game. we were, as constructed, easily 2 or 3...when Rondo goes down, 3-5. no reason we should be fighting for #7 but we are.

  There were various reasons that we were struggling (injuries, people missing rotations on defense, too many players with inconsistent roles/minutes) that would have eventually gone away, in fact most of them have already. Doc was coaching to get the team ready for the playoffs, not necessarily to win as many games as possible during the season.

i still don't see us being that seed.
i wonder what we would rank with our record since january
Nothing to see here
Kane3387
Bailey Howell
****

Tommy Points: 428
Offline Offline

Posts: 4519


Intensity!!!


Email
« Reply #92 on: February 28, 2013, 12:14:57 PM »

Yes he is
Nothing to see here

Duuuude whaaaat is up with yo shorts?...



Bird, Issel, Lever, Dawkins, Free, Ainge, Lucas, Drew, Woolridge, Bailey, Donaldson, Kupchak
Coach: Heinsohn
kgainez
Kevin Garnett


Tommy Points: 30
Offline Offline

Posts: 760


Email
« Reply #93 on: February 28, 2013, 12:43:22 PM »

i do think is a much better playoff series coach than regular season
and i think that's because he plays strictly from matchups. and then of course, you play them more than once, you start to understand certain things

and whle we overachieved last year, i think, for a team with a broken PP, Ray, Steamer...we were close to ECF. I mean...we won 3.5 quarters of game 6. then something happened...I have no clue what. It just stopped.

but my point was even tho that happened, we went 6 games with a wack ATL and 7 with the sixers. smh.

i'd be a tinch happier if he utilized the talent before we had an opp to go sub500. i don't think team should've ever been sub 500 unless we lost our first game. we were, as constructed, easily 2 or 3...when Rondo goes down, 3-5. no reason we should be fighting for #7 but we are.

  There were various reasons that we were struggling (injuries, people missing rotations on defense, too many players with inconsistent roles/minutes) that would have eventually gone away, in fact most of them have already. Doc was coaching to get the team ready for the playoffs, not necessarily to win as many games as possible during the season.

i still don't see us being that seed.
i wonder what we would rank with our record since january

looked it up
not sure how relevant it is, just wanted to share

(as of 2/27)

Heat 20-6 (.769)
Pacers 18-8 (.692)
Nets 18-9 (.667)
Celtics 16-11 (.592)
Bulls 16-12 (.571)
Knicks 13-11 (.541)
Hawks 14-13 (.518)
Wizards 14-14 (.500)
Cavs 13-13 (.500)
Bucks 12-15 (.444)
Nothing to see here
Snakehead
Bill Walton
**

Tommy Points: 108
Offline Offline

Posts: 2204



Email
« Reply #94 on: March 02, 2013, 08:08:29 AM »

So can we give Doc credit for a smart change up last night in the Warriors game with the zone?  Or was that Thibs again somehow?
Nothing to see here
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]   


User Tools

Welcome Guest

Welcome to the CelticsBlog Forums.
SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines