0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Does anybody remember what the score was before terry hit that big 3? I'm trying to remember.
definitely not. He's been a role player for most of his career
Quote from: LarBrd33 on February 10, 2013, 10:52:41 PMdefinitely not. He's been a role player for most of his careerwhat does it mean to be a role player? Is this used to describe non-eilte players. It cannot just mean players that perform a role because all players perform a role some to lead some to support. If you fulfill your 'role' as a supporting player magnificently why should you not be considered for the hall of fame. After all we know that BB is a team game and championships are won by teams not individuals. Therefore, I do not see why been just a 'role' player should take one out of the running for the Hall.Was Horry a role player.. he has more rings than MJ with multiple teams - Is he a HOF?
Well, b-r.com's for Hall of Fame probability have Bosh at 89.17% (or approximately between Ray Allen and Kevin McHale) and Jason Terry at 1.6% (or less than Antoine Walker...or Rajon Rondo, for that matter).EDIT: Well, I was slow looking stuff up.
Quote from: LooseCannon on February 10, 2013, 10:16:17 PMWell, b-r.com's for Hall of Fame probability have Bosh at 89.17% (or approximately between Ray Allen and Kevin McHale) and Jason Terry at 1.6% (or less than Antoine Walker...or Rajon Rondo, for that matter).EDIT: Well, I was slow looking stuff up.Steve Nash is at .57............ and Bosh is at 89... Bosh is a ****ing dinosaur that rides the coat tails of 2 better team mates. I actually find it hard for Wade to be that high.Nash > Wade in HoF standard imho
Quote from: Smutzy#9 on February 11, 2013, 04:28:17 AMQuote from: LooseCannon on February 10, 2013, 10:16:17 PMWell, b-r.com's for Hall of Fame probability have Bosh at 89.17% (or approximately between Ray Allen and Kevin McHale) and Jason Terry at 1.6% (or less than Antoine Walker...or Rajon Rondo, for that matter).EDIT: Well, I was slow looking stuff up.Steve Nash is at .57............ and Bosh is at 89... Bosh is a ****ing dinosaur that rides the coat tails of 2 better team mates. I actually find it hard for Wade to be that high.Nash > Wade in HoF standard imhoThat formula puts too much emphasis on championships, because I think Nash is a surefire HOFer
Quote from: CelticConcourse on February 11, 2013, 07:23:49 AMQuote from: Smutzy#9 on February 11, 2013, 04:28:17 AMQuote from: LooseCannon on February 10, 2013, 10:16:17 PMWell, b-r.com's for Hall of Fame probability have Bosh at 89.17% (or approximately between Ray Allen and Kevin McHale) and Jason Terry at 1.6% (or less than Antoine Walker...or Rajon Rondo, for that matter).EDIT: Well, I was slow looking stuff up.Steve Nash is at .57............ and Bosh is at 89... Bosh is a ****ing dinosaur that rides the coat tails of 2 better team mates. I actually find it hard for Wade to be that high.Nash > Wade in HoF standard imhoThat formula puts too much emphasis on championships, because I think Nash is a surefire HOFerYou have it backwards. The formula is based on players that are actually in the HOF. It looks at their stats, career achievements, etc. and then the formula is created. So it doesn't put too much emphasis on championships it is just that guys that win championships as a 1st or 2nd or option on the team by and large make the HOF. MVP's is the other thing that rates very highly. IN fact there isn't a single MVP that is eligible that isn't in the HOF, so I am a bit surprised Nash is that low since he has 2 of them.
this was discussed when he first came to boston. he is no way a hall of famer and if he by some chance were to get in, then the hof has significantly lowered its standards imo
Quote from: Moranis on February 11, 2013, 08:30:18 AMQuote from: CelticConcourse on February 11, 2013, 07:23:49 AMQuote from: Smutzy#9 on February 11, 2013, 04:28:17 AMQuote from: LooseCannon on February 10, 2013, 10:16:17 PMWell, b-r.com's for Hall of Fame probability have Bosh at 89.17% (or approximately between Ray Allen and Kevin McHale) and Jason Terry at 1.6% (or less than Antoine Walker...or Rajon Rondo, for that matter).EDIT: Well, I was slow looking stuff up.Steve Nash is at .57............ and Bosh is at 89... Bosh is a ****ing dinosaur that rides the coat tails of 2 better team mates. I actually find it hard for Wade to be that high.Nash > Wade in HoF standard imhoThat formula puts too much emphasis on championships, because I think Nash is a surefire HOFerYou have it backwards. The formula is based on players that are actually in the HOF. It looks at their stats, career achievements, etc. and then the formula is created. So it doesn't put too much emphasis on championships it is just that guys that win championships as a 1st or 2nd or option on the team by and large make the HOF. MVP's is the other thing that rates very highly. IN fact there isn't a single MVP that is eligible that isn't in the HOF, so I am a bit surprised Nash is that low since he has 2 of them.Well, Nash didn't win a championship and has MVPs, he's almost a guaranteed lock... yet the formula says he is .57, doesn't that mean the formula puts too much emphasis on championships??Quote from: dark_lord on February 11, 2013, 08:37:55 AMthis was discussed when he first came to boston. he is no way a hall of famer and if he by some chance were to get in, then the hof has significantly lowered its standards imoRalph Sampson made it.