CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.

CelticsBlog ForumsCeltics BasketballCeltics TalkPierce and KG, Dynamic Duo.... What Could Have Been
Page: [1]   
Author Topic: Pierce and KG, Dynamic Duo.... What Could Have Been  (Read 610 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Bankshot
Tiny Archibald
*******

Tommy Points: 625
Offline Offline

Posts: 7391



Email
« on: February 07, 2013, 11:00:44 PM »

It's a shame we didn't get KG to pair with Pierce 3 or 4 years earlier than we did.  I believe they win at least 3 championships by now.  These guys are two of the most competitive stars in the league and we are lucky to have them.  Just look at what they're doing at their ages.  :o  They still have the skill, but it's a whole lot of heart too.

I just love Pierce and KG so much!  Pierce a bit more because he's a lifetime Celtic.
Nothing to see here

"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson
ScottHow
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 210
Online Online

Posts: 1644


It's what I do! It's who I am!


WWWEmail
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2013, 11:14:05 PM »

If there is any player in the league that looks like he was born to be a Celtic, it's KG.
Nothing to see here

GreenEnvy
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 167
Online Online

Posts: 1771



Email
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2013, 11:33:57 AM »

I think they would have been a dynasty (even without Ray) if they were together in their mid to late 20's. KG's numbers were mind boggling from 2002-07 and we all know what a prolific scorer Pierce was.

Pierce is my favorite player and the reason I became a Celtics fan in 2001, but nobody embodies the definition of a Celtic like Kevin Garnett.
Nothing to see here

I AM A CELTIC
Bankshot
Tiny Archibald
*******

Tommy Points: 625
Offline Offline

Posts: 7391



Email
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2013, 09:34:11 AM »

I think they would have been a dynasty (even without Ray) if they were together in their mid to late 20's. KG's numbers were mind boggling from 2002-07 and we all know what a prolific scorer Pierce was.

Pierce is my favorite player and the reason I became a Celtics fan in 2001, but nobody embodies the definition of a Celtic like Kevin Garnett.

I agree.  They would have won championships without Ray. That's why I didn't mention him when creating this thread.  Pierce and KG are two of the most competitive stars in the league.  It's a shame Pierce didn't make the allstar team with the way he is playing.  I think he missed it due to the slump he went through.  Many thought he was done. But no, he's not. 8)

That game last night was a testament to their competitiveness.
Nothing to see here

"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson
scaryjerry
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 68
Online Online

Posts: 1503



Email
« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2013, 09:45:53 AM »

Nah even they had said maybe it wouldn't have worked earlier in their careers, all the losing they did over their careers redefined them and made them get to the point of willing to sacrifice individual things for team...yeah the Celtics would've been relevant but I don't think there's any guarantee of championships against the Shaq lakers or Duncan spurs
Nothing to see here
scaryjerry
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 68
Online Online

Posts: 1503



Email
« Reply #5 on: February 11, 2013, 09:47:28 AM »

I think they would have been a dynasty (even without Ray) if they were together in their mid to late 20's. KG's numbers were mind boggling from 2002-07 and we all know what a prolific scorer Pierce was.

Pierce is my favorite player and the reason I became a Celtics fan in 2001, but nobody embodies the definition of a Celtic like Kevin Garnett.


Numbers mean nothing...he became a champ when he stopped caring about numbers on first round playoff fodder teams
Nothing to see here
Greenbean
Don Chaney
***

Tommy Points: 404
Offline Offline

Posts: 3542



Email
« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2013, 10:16:06 AM »

I think they would have been a dynasty (even without Ray) if they were together in their mid to late 20's. KG's numbers were mind boggling from 2002-07 and we all know what a prolific scorer Pierce was.

Pierce is my favorite player and the reason I became a Celtics fan in 2001, but nobody embodies the definition of a Celtic like Kevin Garnett.


Numbers mean nothing...he became a champ when he stopped caring about numbers on first round playoff fodder teams

I dont think KG ever cared about offensive numbers. Actually his biggest cirticism in those years was NOT dominating the ball and being passive on the offensifve end at times. Pierce howver would have needed an adjustment period but Doc was turning him into a team player starting in 2005.
Nothing to see here
Kane3387
Bailey Howell
****

Tommy Points: 428
Offline Offline

Posts: 4519


Intensity!!!


Email
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2013, 10:21:00 AM »

A dynasty. We would have been in the finals every year in the early 2000s had Antoine Walker been KG.
Nothing to see here

Duuuude whaaaat is up with yo shorts?...



Bird, Issel, Lever, Dawkins, Free, Ainge, Lucas, Drew, Woolridge, Bailey, Donaldson, Kupchak
Coach: Heinsohn
Pages: [1]   


User Tools

Welcome Guest

Welcome to the CelticsBlog Forums.
SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines