CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.

CelticsBlog ForumsAround the LeagueTrade Ideas and RumorsTrade Idea with the Nets
Page: 1 [2]   
Author Topic: Trade Idea with the Nets  (Read 921 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
eugen
Kevin Garnett


Tommy Points: 18
Offline Offline

Posts: 778


Email
« Reply #15 on: February 05, 2013, 10:48:33 PM »

For all the hate Humphries gets I've always liked his game..plus he does something well that we don't do well
Humphries is a double-double threat when given minutes,

Stop here! When given minutes...well mentioned...Can U imagine how many minutes Doc might give to mr. Kardashian? See Wilcox and Collins etc.

Humphries would be a clear upgrade on either of those two, down season & all.

What do you mean UPGRADE if is gonna play 4-5 minutes/game?
Nothing to see here
Donoghus
Global Moderator
Cedric Maxwell
****************

Tommy Points: 279
Offline Offline

Posts: 16913


What a Pub Should Be


Email
« Reply #16 on: February 05, 2013, 10:51:25 PM »

For all the hate Humphries gets I've always liked his game..plus he does something well that we don't do well
Humphries is a double-double threat when given minutes,

Stop here! When given minutes...well mentioned...Can U imagine how many minutes Doc might give to mr. Kardashian? See Wilcox and Collins etc.

Humphries would be a clear upgrade on either of those two, down season & all.

What do you mean UPGRADE if is gonna play 4-5 minutes/game?

He's not gonna be playing 4-5 minutes a game if that trade goes down.  He's immediately a rotation guy on the Celtics.
Nothing to see here



'13 CB Historical Draft Milwaukee Bucks

PG- Norm Nixon, Darnell Valentine
SG- David Thompson, Craig Hodges
SF- James Worthy, Calvin Natt, Robert Reid
PF- Terry Cummings, Rick Mahorn
C- Moses Malone, Tom Owens, Chuck Nevitt
Coach- Dr. Jack Ramsay
kozlodoev
Paul Silas
******

Tommy Points: 378
Offline Offline

Posts: 6527



Email
« Reply #17 on: February 05, 2013, 10:57:10 PM »

For all the hate Humphries gets I've always liked his game..plus he does something well that we don't do well
Humphries is a double-double threat when given minutes,

Stop here! When given minutes...well mentioned...Can U imagine how many minutes Doc might give to mr. Kardashian? See Wilcox and Collins etc.
Doc gave Bass 30+ minutes last season. I have no reason for  Humphries not to get more than this, having in mind that:

(a) he's a better player than Bass
(b) we really have no other PFs
Nothing to see here

Managing Rilski Sportist to glory at http://www.buzzerbeater.com
kozlodoev
Paul Silas
******

Tommy Points: 378
Offline Offline

Posts: 6527



Email
« Reply #18 on: February 05, 2013, 11:03:26 PM »

He's not gonna be playing 4-5 minutes a game if that trade goes down.  He's immediately a rotation guy on the Celtics.
If we're giving up Bass to get him, he's pretty much an automatic starter with guaranteed 30+ minutes per game.

He must be attainable, given his rotation status and contract, I just wonder if he can be had without giving up too much.
Nothing to see here

Managing Rilski Sportist to glory at http://www.buzzerbeater.com
bfrombleacher
Bill Walton
**

Tommy Points: 324
Offline Offline

Posts: 2724


Email
« Reply #19 on: February 05, 2013, 11:08:50 PM »

Man I wish Bass straight up would match Kardashian's contract...
Nothing to see here
LooseCannon
Antoine Walker
*****

Tommy Points: 381
Online Online

Posts: 5288



Email
« Reply #20 on: February 05, 2013, 11:32:01 PM »

I think I prefer Bass to Humphries.
Nothing to see here

"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference
Yoki_IsTheName
Don Chaney
***

Tommy Points: 559
Offline Offline

Posts: 3787


I'm a Paul Heyman guy.


Email
« Reply #21 on: February 05, 2013, 11:32:27 PM »

Im not sure I would throw in Jet with the way he's playing right now. But I love thebidea of a Bass-Humphries swap. If the Nets would be okaybwith future picks then im all for it.
Nothing to see here

2013 Historical Draft: LA Lakers
C  - Kareem (71-72), Paultz (75-76)
PF - Roundfield (81-82), Robinson (81-82)
SF - M.L. Carr (78-79), Tripucka (82-83)
SG - Moncrief (83-84), M.Cooper (86-87)
PG - Buse (75-76), L.Drew (82-83)
Mitchell (80-81), Sparrow (82-83)
action781
Don Chaney
***

Tommy Points: 246
Offline Offline

Posts: 3207


Email
« Reply #22 on: February 06, 2013, 12:19:23 AM »

Im not sure I would throw in Jet with the way he's playing right now. But I love thebidea of a Bass-Humphries swap. If the Nets would be okaybwith future picks then im all for it.

I feel the same way.  I'm expecting Terry to start being the Terry we were expecting 5 months ago which is a really good player.  We're already starting to see it.

As for the picks, it would in no way be worth adding a first, but a second I'd be down with.  Don't know if that's enough for Brooklyn unfortunately.
Nothing to see here

.................to the
Assistant ^ General Manager for the Pawnee Pacers

Tony Parker, Courtney Lee, Rudy Gay, Zach Randolph, Marc Gasol
Jeff Teague, Paul George, Trevor Ariza, Chuck Hayes, Channing Frye
Kemba Walker, Andres Nocioni, Jason Collins
kozlodoev
Paul Silas
******

Tommy Points: 378
Offline Offline

Posts: 6527



Email
« Reply #23 on: February 06, 2013, 10:35:28 AM »

I think I prefer Bass to Humphries.
There are similar in many ways, but Humphries is a considerably better rebounder and shot blocker -- and that's an area of need for us.
Nothing to see here

Managing Rilski Sportist to glory at http://www.buzzerbeater.com
nostar
Brandon Bass


Tommy Points: 30
Offline Offline

Posts: 350


Email
« Reply #24 on: February 06, 2013, 11:18:25 AM »

Hey I thought this was a really interesting and clever trade. I'm not thrilled about losing JET but I really like Watson. I know he has some decision making problems but I think he's a very good backup PG. I also think at 28 he's settled in to the idea of a bench role. He's never started consistently (around 17% of his games).

Humphries is an obvious upgrade over Bass in everything but mid-range shooting. It's not like we lack that right now.

I'd make this trade for sure. I'd also accept a Watson/Blatche swap. I think to get a capable big man we should offer Lee or Terry.
Nothing to see here
kozlodoev
Paul Silas
******

Tommy Points: 378
Offline Offline

Posts: 6527



Email
« Reply #25 on: February 06, 2013, 11:27:45 AM »

I like it but I doubt we could get C.J. Watson & doubt they would want Terry, but if we take Humphries heavy contract I would want some candy back in return for my troubles. Courtney Lee fits better for their corner & kick style in Bogans spot so I would do this.

Boston sends:  Brandon Bass, Courtney Lee & Fab Melo

Boston receives: Kris Humphries, Andray Blatche & Marshon Brooks
Apparently Nets fans think that a similar combination can land them Garnett and Terry. Heh.

http://thebrooklyngame.com/boston-celtics-brooklyn-nets-kevin-garnett-trade-speculation/
Nothing to see here

Managing Rilski Sportist to glory at http://www.buzzerbeater.com
Birdman
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 91
Offline Offline

Posts: 1203


Email
« Reply #26 on: February 06, 2013, 11:32:48 AM »

Cant trade Terry..he has a Celtic tattoo.. ;)
Nothing to see here
PhoSita
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 109
Offline Offline

Posts: 1602



Email
« Reply #27 on: February 06, 2013, 12:23:00 PM »

No thank you to Kris Humphries.
Nothing to see here
Pages: 1 [2]   


User Tools

Welcome Guest

Welcome to the CelticsBlog Forums.
SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines