greenhead85
Brandon Bass
Tommy Points: 24
OfflinePosts: 437
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: January 23, 2013, 09:09:11 PM » |
|
I do not like the idea of having Ty Lawson as Rondo's replacement. Sure, Ty could shoot the 3 and pass but his size is a handicap.
I would support a trade of
Rondo + Collins for Tyreke + JThompson.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
Smokeeye123
Rajon Rondo
Tommy Points: 40
OfflinePosts: 532

|
 |
« Reply #46 on: January 23, 2013, 09:11:01 PM » |
|
Rondo for Faried and McGee works in the ESPN trade machine. That would certainly beef up the frontcourt. 
I would do that trade.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
syfy9
Paul Pierce
Tommy Points: 260
OnlinePosts: 1472
We might as well put Tyrion in at center.
|
 |
« Reply #47 on: January 23, 2013, 09:11:21 PM » |
|
Yeah, guys, Ty Lawson doesn't necessarily have to be in the trade.
We could move Bradley at starting PG, maybe get Miller to back up. Good tutor for Bradley.
Also, Lawson coming of the bench would be ideal - having him in a just scoring mentality and all that.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
With the 16th pick of the 2013 NBA Draft, the Boston Celtics select Daenerys Targaryen (and her 3 dragons + 8000 Unsullied) from the continent of Essos!
|
|
|
Kane3387
Bailey Howell   
Tommy Points: 436
OfflinePosts: 4616
Intensity!!!
|
 |
« Reply #48 on: January 23, 2013, 09:13:38 PM » |
|
Due to Lawson's Poison Pill contract I could only get one unrealistic deal to work in the ESPN Trade Machine that contained Lawson. http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=ahz7ubeBoston receives: Lawson, Mcghee, Gallo, Chandler, and Brewer Denver receives: Rondo, Green, Bass, Terry, Lee, Collins, and Barbosa. I would NOT do this deal lol. Too many incoming and outgoing for a mid-season deal. Getting Lawson in a deal, that makes sense for the Celtics, for Rondo doesn't seem feasible.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
|
Who
|
 |
« Reply #49 on: January 23, 2013, 09:15:08 PM » |
|
Yeah, guys, Ty Lawson doesn't necessarily have to be in the trade.
We could move Bradley at starting PG, maybe get Miller to back up. Good tutor for Bradley.
Also, Lawson coming of the bench would be ideal - having him in a just scoring mentality and all that.
2 out of 3 of Ty Lawson, Andre Iguodala and/or Danilo Gallinari would need to be in the deal.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
syfy9
Paul Pierce
Tommy Points: 260
OnlinePosts: 1472
We might as well put Tyrion in at center.
|
 |
« Reply #50 on: January 23, 2013, 09:29:14 PM » |
|
Yeah, guys, Ty Lawson doesn't necessarily have to be in the trade.
We could move Bradley at starting PG, maybe get Miller to back up. Good tutor for Bradley.
Also, Lawson coming of the bench would be ideal - having him in a just scoring mentality and all that.
2 out of 3 of Ty Lawson, Andre Iguodala and/or Danilo Gallinari would need to be in the deal.
Rondo + Green + Bass for Iggy + Faried + Mosgov + Miller + Hamilton Bradley/Miller Iggy/Lee/Terry Pierce/Hamilton Faried/Sully KG/Mosgov
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=akyjjzk
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
With the 16th pick of the 2013 NBA Draft, the Boston Celtics select Daenerys Targaryen (and her 3 dragons + 8000 Unsullied) from the continent of Essos!
|
|
|
Kane3387
Bailey Howell   
Tommy Points: 436
OfflinePosts: 4616
Intensity!!!
|
 |
« Reply #51 on: January 23, 2013, 09:30:35 PM » |
|
I would do this deal though. I would only do this deal because PG is the easiest position to acquire in today's NBA. Lots of ingoing and outgoing players in this one too so it is unrealistic as well. http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=bzhxwl8Boston receives: Igoudala, Gallo, Andre Miller, Koufos, and Fraried Denver receives: Rondo, Green, Bass, *Terry or Lee, Collins, and Barbosa * I would prefer to move Terry over Lee, but I would live with moving Lee instead if the Nuggets made getting him over Terry a deal breaker. Boston's lineup: Miller/Bradley/Delonte? And Iggy could play some point forward Iggy/Lee/ Bradley/ Delonte? Pierce/Gallo/Iggy/Lee Fraried/Sullinger/Gallo/Kenyon Martin? KG/Koufos/Wilcox/Melo Denver's Lineup: Rondo/Lawson/Barbosa Chandler/Lawson/Terry/Brewer Green/Chandler/Brewer Bass/Green/A. Randolph Mcghee/Mozgov/Collins After looking at Denver's lineup they are likely giving up too much as far as chemistry and fit. I think talent wise it's even since they keep Lawson and Mcghee. I just don't realistically see a trade that makes sense for both teams and actually works with Rondo as the main piece being moved.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
ssspence
Don Chaney  
Tommy Points: 229
OfflinePosts: 3855
James Naismith to Dickey Betts for the jam.....
|
 |
« Reply #52 on: January 23, 2013, 09:37:50 PM » |
|
I would do this deal though. I would only do this deal because PG is the easiest position to acquire in today's NBA.
Lots of ingoing and outgoing players in this one too so it is unrealistic as well.
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=bzhxwl8
Boston receives: Igoudala, Gallo, Andre Miller, Koufos, and Fraried Denver receives: Rondo, Green, Bass, *Terry or Lee, Collins, and Barbosa
* I would prefer to move Terry over Lee, but I would live with moving Lee instead if the Nuggets made getting him over Terry a deal breaker.
Boston's lineup:
Miller/Bradley/Delonte? And Iggy could play some point forward Iggy/Lee/ Bradley/ Delonte? Pierce/Gallo/Iggy/Lee Fraried/Sullinger/Gallo/Kenyon Martin? KG/Koufos/Wilcox/Melo
Denver's Lineup:
Rondo/Lawson/Barbosa Chandler/Lawson/Terry/Brewer Green/Chandler/Brewer Bass/Green/A. Randolph Mcghee/Mozgov/Collins
After looking at Denver's lineup they are likely giving up too much as far as chemistry and fit. I think talent wise it's even since they keep Lawson and Mcghee.
I just don't realistically see a trade that makes sense for both teams and actually works with Rondo as the main piece being moved.
I think if the Nuggets used their trade exception from the Nene deal to take Terry or Bass first, a more approachable trade could then be worked out for Lawson.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
Smitty77
NCE Kevin Garnett
Tommy Points: 84
OfflinePosts: 817
|
 |
« Reply #53 on: January 23, 2013, 09:39:02 PM » |
|
My proposed trade works on Realgm.com tradechecker.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
scaryjerry
Paul Pierce
Tommy Points: 69
OfflinePosts: 1556
|
 |
« Reply #54 on: January 23, 2013, 09:44:21 PM » |
|
Rondo for Faried and McGee works in the ESPN trade machine. That would certainly beef up the frontcourt. 
I would do that trade.
you'd regret that trade.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
Smitty77
NCE Kevin Garnett
Tommy Points: 84
OfflinePosts: 817
|
 |
« Reply #55 on: January 23, 2013, 09:45:16 PM » |
|
Ashylarry,
We might not even make the playoffs THIS year. Why would we be worried about maybe NOT getting past the second round?:-))
Smitty77
|
|
|
| « Last Edit: January 23, 2013, 10:58:55 PM by Smitty77 »
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
reelbig4
Jason Terry
Tommy Points: 7
OfflinePosts: 79
|
 |
« Reply #56 on: January 23, 2013, 09:47:32 PM » |
|
Celtics don't need to trade Rondo, Celtics need young scorers, imagine Rondo with Cousins instead of Garnett and Rudy Gay instead of Pierce, this would be a different kind of beast, just saying
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
|
Roy H.
|
 |
« Reply #57 on: January 23, 2013, 09:52:41 PM » |
|
I'm not sure if anybody linked to Ford's original quote, but this was clearly just his speculation: Steve (Missouri)
You've mentioned the possibility of the Celtics dealing Rondo. If they went down that road, who might have the desire and pieces to be a trade partner?
Chad Ford (1:10 PM): It's just one option for Danny Ainge. I think their first preference is to add a big man without breaking up their veteran core of KG, Paul Pierce and Rondo. But if they can't do that, I do think the Rondo, and even Paul Pierce, trade options are on the table. Rondo's been on the block before and despite his incredible play, hasn't drawn huge interest because of his reputation of being a difficult player to coach and a tough teammate. With that said I wouldn't be shocked to see a team like the Nuggets get in the picture. Yes, they have two point guards already, but Rondo would be an upgrade on a team trying to compete right now and they have the pieces that could entice Danny Ainge to make a deal.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino Once a CrotoNat, always a CrotoNat. CelticsBlog Draft Champions, 2009 & 2012
|
|
|
PhoSita
Paul Pierce
Tommy Points: 130
OfflinePosts: 1973
|
 |
« Reply #58 on: January 23, 2013, 09:55:41 PM » |
|
I'm not sure if anybody linked to Ford's original quote, but this was clearly just his speculation:
Steve (Missouri)
You've mentioned the possibility of the Celtics dealing Rondo. If they went down that road, who might have the desire and pieces to be a trade partner?
Chad Ford (1:10 PM): It's just one option for Danny Ainge. I think their first preference is to add a big man without breaking up their veteran core of KG, Paul Pierce and Rondo. But if they can't do that, I do think the Rondo, and even Paul Pierce, trade options are on the table. Rondo's been on the block before and despite his incredible play, hasn't drawn huge interest because of his reputation of being a difficult player to coach and a tough teammate. With that said I wouldn't be shocked to see a team like the Nuggets get in the picture. Yes, they have two point guards already, but Rondo would be an upgrade on a team trying to compete right now and they have the pieces that could entice Danny Ainge to make a deal. I figured as much. Denver and Boston don't really make much sense as trade partners.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
|
IndeedProceed
|
 |
« Reply #59 on: January 23, 2013, 10:01:38 PM » |
|
Denver's trade scenarios don't interest me that much. Lawson/Iggy would be cool, but...eh, I don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
|