0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore;_ylt=AjLW66nuM4WGl4jJsQMWPWYUPKB4?gid=2010061713Upon looking back at the game we would have won with Perk, here a few things that stand out to me.The Lakers got 56 minutes out of their bench, the Celtics just 30 minutesTony Allen was -9 in just five minutesOut-rebounded 53 to 4025 Celtics fouls to 19 Lakers foulsRasheed played over 35 minutes, before fouling outRondo just two rebounds short of a triple-doubleKobe Bryant had 15 rebounds and Gasol had 18Derek Fisher made both of his 3'sArtest had five steals, three fouls
This game is one of the biggest reasons why I question Doc's ability to coach
Garnett 3 rebounds..gasol 18.That is all
Quote from: OsirusCeltics on January 13, 2013, 04:11:36 PMThis game is one of the biggest reasons why I question Doc's ability to coachYep. He barely played Nate in that game, a game where we struggled to score and needed his offense, despite him helping you win one of the previous playoff games against the Lakers. Also Tony didn't play that much, despite all the accollades Tony was getting for shutting down Kobe. Tony might have even scored on a night when we had trouble scoring. He doesn't shoot, but he drives to the line and gets fouled. He might have even got some of those rebounds that Kobe got. No Celtic played that well, but neither did the Lakers. I really believe had Tony and Nate played down the stretch of that game, we would have won.I totally blamed Doc for that loss and still do. Why bring up this painful loss again?