CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.

CelticsBlog ForumsCeltics BasketballCeltics TalkSullinger drops 12 pts /16 rbs
Page: [1]   
Author Topic: Sullinger drops 12 pts /16 rbs  (Read 1308 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
lightspeed5
Bill Walton
**

Tommy Points: 210
Online Online

Posts: 2700



Email
« on: January 09, 2013, 11:04:07 PM »

big baby's career high rebounds with us was 11. just a thought.
Nothing to see here

bfrombleacher
Bill Walton
**

Tommy Points: 324
Offline Offline

Posts: 2720


Email
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2013, 11:05:58 PM »

He played great defense too. Nice rotations I think.

Gortat and Scola didn't burn us too bad.
Nothing to see here
ScottHow
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 210
Offline Offline

Posts: 1644


It's what I do! It's who I am!


WWWEmail
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2013, 11:06:45 PM »

Just picked him up on my fantasy team too  8)
Nothing to see here

jdz101
Bill Walton
**

Tommy Points: 306
Offline Offline

Posts: 2367



Email
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2013, 11:07:22 PM »

big baby's career high rebounds with us was 11. just a thought.

Sullinger has a far higher ceiling than baby. Much smarter and more skilled around the rim.
Nothing to see here



Fantasy 2012/13 - Boston Lobsters

PG - Ty Lawson //  SG - Vince Carter //  SF - Arron Afflalo // PF - Chris Bosh // C - Demarcus Cousins

Bench: Harrison Barnes // Eric Bledsoe // Enes Kanter // Kris Humphries // Avery Bradley // Courtney Lee // Antawn Jamison
BballTim
Dennis Johnson
******************

Tommy Points: 785
Online Online

Posts: 18084


Email
« Reply #4 on: January 09, 2013, 11:43:24 PM »

big baby's career high rebounds with us was 11. just a thought.

Sullinger has a far higher ceiling than baby. Much smarter and more skilled around the rim.

  The one thing he really needs to learn (that Baby took a while to figure out) is how to use his bulk to carve out some space to get his shot off against taller/longer players.
Nothing to see here
esel1000
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 83
Offline Offline

Posts: 1698


Email
« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2013, 12:09:36 AM »

I watched bit of Sully at Ohio State. When he fell to us at 21, I called it that we got ourselves a massive steal. His bball iq is off the charts, especially for a rookie. More impressive to me than his numbers tonight is that he's a +24 for the night. That's amazing.

Skys the limit for this kid. He has the iq and fundamentals to be a star. Just look at the Knicks game. Playoff atmosphere, wasn't rattled at all. Tonight, he grabs an offensive board for a putback, then draws the charge on the other end directly after. He does so much right out there. Imagine him in a few years. Imagine the numbers he'd be putting up as a first option? This kids a star.

21 is our lucky draft number
Nothing to see here
Celtics17
Rajon Rondo


Tommy Points: 87
Offline Offline

Posts: 613


Email
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2013, 12:09:53 AM »

Didnt I see a thread on here the other day questioning why everyone looks at Sully as untradeable? Maybe it's because in his first significant minutes of the season he hauls down 1 fewer rebound then the entire starting five combined did?
Nothing to see here
PhoSita
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 109
Online Online

Posts: 1602



Email
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2013, 12:17:18 AM »

Okay, I LOVE Jared Sullinger.  Seeing him getting rebounds left and right is a sight for sore eyes.

That said, I think people need to pump the breaks calling him a star or saying he'll be a "first option" or anything like that.  I think perhaps it's been so long since we've seen a legit, talented young big man with upside that we go nuts when there's one on our team.

Sully has shown enough to make me pretty confident that he could start right now and be a very solid, productive player, and that in a few years time he might be a quality player.  I'm not sure I ever see him being an All-Star, and definitely not a top offensive option for a really good team.  But I think a reasonable ceiling for him is a player like David West or Carl Landry, only with better rebounding. 
Nothing to see here
mctyson
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 131
Offline Offline

Posts: 1804


Email
« Reply #8 on: January 10, 2013, 06:41:08 AM »

Mind you...there are people on this blog who wanted to trade Sullinger for Gortat just a few days ago, and probably still would.
Nothing to see here
jdz101
Bill Walton
**

Tommy Points: 306
Offline Offline

Posts: 2367



Email
« Reply #9 on: January 10, 2013, 06:44:25 AM »

Mind you...there are people on this blog who wanted to trade Sullinger for Gortat just a few days ago, and probably still would.

I was always fairly firmly against the idea.

This game just hammered it home for me.
Nothing to see here



Fantasy 2012/13 - Boston Lobsters

PG - Ty Lawson //  SG - Vince Carter //  SF - Arron Afflalo // PF - Chris Bosh // C - Demarcus Cousins

Bench: Harrison Barnes // Eric Bledsoe // Enes Kanter // Kris Humphries // Avery Bradley // Courtney Lee // Antawn Jamison
triboy16f
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 80
Offline Offline

Posts: 1757


Email
« Reply #10 on: January 10, 2013, 07:32:31 AM »

anyone still want to trade sully for gortat now??

Nothing to see here
kozlodoev
Paul Silas
******

Tommy Points: 378
Offline Offline

Posts: 6527



Email
« Reply #11 on: January 10, 2013, 07:59:26 AM »

anyone still want to trade sully for gortat now??
What, you think Gortat never had a game in which he grabbed 16 rebounds?
Nothing to see here

Managing Rilski Sportist to glory at http://www.buzzerbeater.com
SHAQATTACK
NCE
Antoine Walker
*****

Tommy Points: 324
Offline Offline

Posts: 5019



Email
« Reply #12 on: January 10, 2013, 08:03:21 AM »

Been on the Sully bandwagon ever since we got him and found out how the boy can rebound at preseason .

I think by playoffs he could really come up big for this team .  Especially if he can play like he has the last 2-3 games.

No he isn't an Alstar, but a good solid rebounder , which the Celtics were absolutley despert for.  A god send  for some rebounds. 

No , the long term upgrade to GOrtat is not enough to throw alway one of best young rookies in the NBA.

Sully will get betteer, Gor-Toast is what he is.. nothing special.  Sub par defense .

I think Fab Melo can equal Gortat by the end of next year and play BETTER defense and block more shots.

I'm for keeping Sully, AB and FAb.

Nothing to see here
Snakehead
Bill Walton
**

Tommy Points: 108
Offline Offline

Posts: 2204



Email
« Reply #13 on: January 10, 2013, 08:09:34 AM »

big baby's career high rebounds with us was 11. just a thought.

Sullinger has a far higher ceiling than baby. Much smarter and more skilled around the rim.

  The one thing he really needs to learn (that Baby took a while to figure out) is how to use his bulk to carve out some space to get his shot off against taller/longer players.

I agree but he has some options beyond that Big Baby never did.

He has a better pump fake and last night he showed off a little floater/hook type shot of which Big Baby has never had.
Nothing to see here
triboy16f
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 80
Offline Offline

Posts: 1757


Email
« Reply #14 on: January 10, 2013, 08:47:02 AM »

anyone still want to trade sully for gortat now??
What, you think Gortat never had a game in which he grabbed 16 rebounds?
Who cares if he has. Sully has more potential , younger and cheaper.
Nothing to see here
Pages: [1]   


User Tools

Welcome Guest

Welcome to the CelticsBlog Forums.
SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines