CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.

CelticsBlog ForumsAround the LeagueAround the NBAare the Lakers the biggest "star-studded dissapointment"??
Page: 1 [2] 3 4   
Author Topic: are the Lakers the biggest "star-studded dissapointment"??  (Read 3217 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
wdleehi
Forums ViceRoy
Bill Russell
*****************************

Tommy Points: 1189
Offline Offline

Posts: 29279


Pre-school artwork


Email
« Reply #15 on: January 10, 2013, 09:16:30 AM »

They haven't disappointed me yet!





 ;D
Nothing to see here



Running the Clippers with Redz.
Interceptor
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 191
Offline Offline

Posts: 1606



Email
« Reply #16 on: January 10, 2013, 09:20:47 AM »

loving it but I have that horrible feeling deep down that IF the Lakers miss the playoffs this year, they will end up with a top 3 pick and land their next franchise cornerstone
Phoenix would be very happy if the Lakers missed the playoffs and wound up in the lottery.
Nothing to see here
alajet
Kevin Garnett


Tommy Points: 54
Offline Offline

Posts: 787


Email
« Reply #17 on: January 10, 2013, 09:28:38 AM »

Based on the starting lineups, easily they are. But if we were to include benchs in this one, they would probably not be referred to as elite.
Winning with 5 players alone is close to impossible, especially if they suffer from injuries at this pace.
Nothing to see here
slamtheking
Jim Loscutoff
********

Tommy Points: 1760
Offline Offline

Posts: 8178



Email
« Reply #18 on: January 10, 2013, 09:33:07 AM »

loving it but I have that horrible feeling deep down that IF the Lakers miss the playoffs this year, they will end up with a top 3 pick and land their next franchise cornerstone
Phoenix would be very happy if the Lakers missed the playoffs and wound up in the lottery.
Phx gets their pick but somehow that scumbag franchise always lands on their feet.  Frankly, I'd be stunned if they don't somehow end up with a pick in the lottery this year if they miss the playoffs.  Could be a Gasol trade.  Could be a DH trade if he continues to push the idea he won't resign there.  The lakers will scam someone out of their pick   >:(
Nothing to see here

Pick 2 Draft: Miami Heat:

Lebron James, Chris Bosh, Emeka Okafor, Brandon Knight, Lou Williams, Mo Williams, BJ Mullens, Jordan Crawford, Chris Copeland, John Salmons, Kyle O'Quinn, Kurt Thomas, Omri Casspi
Adelaide Celt
Rajon Rondo


Tommy Points: 111
Offline Offline

Posts: 682



Email
« Reply #19 on: January 10, 2013, 09:34:14 AM »

They've looked more beatable than most thought possible. That's been the biggest surprise IMO.

Still a lot of water to go under the bridge yet but these struggles so far go a long way to ensuring they won't have home court advantage in the Playoffs after the 1st round (should they make it of course) and that could be significant.

Couldn't be happening to a bigger bunch of pricks!
Nothing to see here

Darko, calm down. Tell us about your impressions...
Cman
Don Nelson
*********

Tommy Points: 201
Offline Offline

Posts: 9856



Email
« Reply #20 on: January 10, 2013, 09:35:45 AM »

They haven't disappointed me yet!





 ;D

hahahaha!
Feel free to post this on the Lakers board!
Nothing to see here

Celtics fan for life.
Fafnir
Global Moderator
Sam Jones
**********************

Tommy Points: 848
Offline Offline

Posts: 22619



Email
« Reply #21 on: January 10, 2013, 09:43:22 AM »

loving it but I have that horrible feeling deep down that IF the Lakers miss the playoffs this year, they will end up with a top 3 pick and land their next franchise cornerstone
Good news for you, in the trade with the Suns they agreed to send their pick to the Suns if it was in the top 14 (aka lottery).

So there is no upside for them missing the playoffs. Of course that also means they're not ever going to throw in the towel and just tank. They can still make the playoffs, though its going to be very tough.
Nothing to see here

bdm860
Bill Walton
**

Tommy Points: 559
Offline Offline

Posts: 2527



Email
« Reply #22 on: January 10, 2013, 10:12:00 AM »

Nowhere near as star studded, but when I think of failures…

2002 Milwaukee Bucks.

In 2001 they lost in the ECF in 7 games to the Iverson-led Sixers.  There is the belief by some that Stern wanted Philly and not the Bucks in the Finals and will point to the foul shot discrepancy between the 2 teams.

The Bucks had 3 relatively young All-Stars, in Ray Allen (25), Glenn Robison (28), and Sam Cassell (31), though Sam wouldn’t become an All-Star for a few years, he had All-Star talent.

A young stud Tim Thomas, shockingly re-signed with the Bucks, even though he was coming off the bench, instead of attempting to be a star somewhere else.  Ray Allen even said of him, "If he wanted to, Tim Thomas could be the best player in the league."  He re-signed, to come off the bench, in Milwaukee!

A 52 win team, 3 All-Stars, and many Bucks fan’s probably thought of Tim Thomas like we think of Sullinger, or thought of Big Al, or whoever.

Then they go out and sign Anthony Mason coming off an All-Star year.  That’s like 4 All-Stars and a future All-Star, on a team that won 52 games and went to game 7 of the ECF,   Going into March I believe they were 2nd in the East, 1st in their division, at 35-25, then go 6-16 the rest of the way.  Missing the playoffs. 

One game away from the Finals, brought everybody back and added an All-Star, yet missed the playoffs.

Not a big market, so nobody remembered, and not as big as the Lakers missing would be, but still quite the disappointment.


Also think of the '99 Rockets.  Had Barkely and Olajuwon, had there not been a lockout, Drexler might have stuck around too.  They go out and sign Scottie Pippen.  1st round playoff loss in 4 games.  Again not as big of a disappointment as the Lakers would be, but still disappointing.
Nothing to see here


After 18 months with their Bigs, the Littles were: 46% less likely to use illegal drugs, 27% less likely to use alcohol, 52% less likely to skip school, 37% less likely to skip a class
Yoki_IsTheName
Bailey Howell
****

Tommy Points: 578
Online Online

Posts: 4019


I'm a Paul Heyman guy.


Email
« Reply #23 on: January 10, 2013, 10:22:07 AM »

No. I still think it's 2010 Miami Heat.

That team should have won the Championship. But hey, I think they erased that by winning the next year.

Them and the Dallas team that got bounced by the Dubs in the 1st round.

As star studded as the Lakers current team is, we gotta put into perspective that Nash is old, Howard is not himself they have no bench at all. The Miami team, while has no solid bench either have 3 healthy, in their prime superstars, one being the MVP. The Dallas team, well...
Nothing to see here

DKC Golden State Dubs.

Steph/Nash
Klay/Rush/Bazemore
Barnes-ey/Draymond Green
Pau (Pow Pow)
Bogut/Fab/Colton Iverson
SHAQATTACK
NCE
Antoine Walker
*****

Tommy Points: 331
Offline Offline

Posts: 5266



Email
« Reply #24 on: January 10, 2013, 10:52:30 AM »

I've been losing alot of sleep over the Lakers poor showing this year. 

I worry do they have enough stars to really compete.?

How can they be expected to win with such second rate stars.

If I was STERN ..I would immediately make some small franchise teams give up their stars like ..DURANT and ZBO ...its not fair .

My heart is so broken over the Lakers woes...

They deserve much better players.
Nothing to see here
pearljammer10
Jim Loscutoff
********

Tommy Points: 426
Offline Offline

Posts: 8233



Email
« Reply #25 on: January 10, 2013, 11:00:51 AM »

I wonder how much different this Lakers team would look if the Chris Paul trade actually went through. Would they still have been able to swing a deal for Howard. They would be lacking even more pieces than they have now.
Nothing to see here

DKC: GM Boston Celtics

Rondo/Miller
Pierce/Terry
Green
Boozer/Sully
KG/Randolph
Bankshot
Tiny Archibald
*******

Tommy Points: 625
Offline Offline

Posts: 7397



Email
« Reply #26 on: January 10, 2013, 11:27:11 AM »

I think the 2004 Lakers were a bigger disappointment.  They had Gary Payton, Karl Malone, Kobe and Shaq.  People thought they were a lock for the championship, but they got beat by a team with no superstars, the Detroit Pistons.
Nothing to see here

"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson
Fafnir
Global Moderator
Sam Jones
**********************

Tommy Points: 848
Offline Offline

Posts: 22619



Email
« Reply #27 on: January 10, 2013, 11:31:22 AM »

I think the 2004 Lakers were a bigger disappointment.  They had Gary Payton, Karl Malone, Kobe and Shaq.  People thought they were a lock for the championship, but they got beat by a team with no superstars, the Detroit Pistons.
They still made the Finals and Malone was hurt badly and couldn't play there.

Plus Detroit wasn't chopped liver either, they returned to the Finals and almost defeated the Spurs next year.

I don't see how 2004 Lakers were more disappointing than this current Lakers squad potentially missing the playoffs.
Nothing to see here

wdleehi
Forums ViceRoy
Bill Russell
*****************************

Tommy Points: 1189
Offline Offline

Posts: 29279


Pre-school artwork


Email
« Reply #28 on: January 10, 2013, 11:33:30 AM »

No. I still think it's 2010 Miami Heat.

That team should have won the Championship. But hey, I think they erased that by winning the next year.

Them and the Dallas team that got bounced by the Dubs in the 1st round.

As star studded as the Lakers current team is, we gotta put into perspective that Nash is old, Howard is not himself they have no bench at all. The Miami team, while has no solid bench either have 3 healthy, in their prime superstars, one being the MVP. The Dallas team, well...


That team made it to the Finals.  Hardly a failure.
Nothing to see here



Running the Clippers with Redz.
fairweatherfan
Danny Ainge
**********

Tommy Points: 1196
Online Online

Posts: 10344



Email
« Reply #29 on: January 10, 2013, 11:33:51 AM »

So far, yeah.  Lots of injuries but injuries are "disappointing" too, and the names are what people really care about. 

Don't forget they've actually got 5 guys with multiple All-Stars (Jamison).  With Kobe and Howard locks to make this year's team they might actually finish with more All-Star appearances (at least 36) than wins.  How's that for a star-studded depressing stat?
Nothing to see here
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   


User Tools

Welcome Guest

Welcome to the CelticsBlog Forums.
SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines