Author Topic: The truth is... we don't need Rondo  (Read 8739 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

The truth is... we don't need Rondo
« on: January 08, 2013, 10:02:14 AM »

Offline Global Celtic

  • Avery Bradley
  • Posts: 294
  • Tommy Points: 72
Gambles too much on D, coasts at 50% of the regular season, 'style over substance' on offense, not the consistent leader every championship-caliber team needs.
Without him everything is more simple, fluid and effective. In one word: better.
I think a future trade should always involve Rondo, not Sullinger or Bradley.

Re: The truth is... we don't need Rondo
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2013, 10:04:41 AM »

Offline bfrombleacher

  • Bailey Howell
  • ***
  • Posts: 3342
  • Tommy Points: 367


.

Re: The truth is... we don't need Rondo
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2013, 10:09:08 AM »

Offline rondohondo

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7856
  • Tommy Points: 805


 ;)

Re: The truth is... we don't need Rondo
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2013, 10:09:37 AM »

Offline CelticG1

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • ****
  • Posts: 4201
  • Tommy Points: 288
Come one game. Everyone played their butt off and contributed big time. Pierce was a beast. You can't expect that every night without Rondo. So when the C's win this game or the Hawks.game 2 last year it just shows how ballsy this team is. We can still win without Rondo but in the long run we really need him.

Btw did you see Rondo against the Hawks on Saturday?

Re: The truth is... we don't need Rondo
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2013, 10:10:21 AM »

Offline Edgar

  • Global Moderator
  • Kevin McHale
  • ************************
  • Posts: 24662
  • Tommy Points: 438
  • No contaban con mi astucia !!!
yay.....
Once a CrotorNat always a CROTORNAT  2 times CB draft Champion 2009-2012

Visit the CelticsBlog Live Game Chat![/url]

Re: The truth is... we don't need Rondo
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2013, 10:11:02 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Global Moderator
  • Bob Cousy
  • **************************
  • Posts: 26578
  • Tommy Points: 1017
We definitely need Rondo, Pierce/KG can't carry the offense like they did last night every game anymore.

Re: The truth is... we don't need Rondo
« Reply #6 on: January 08, 2013, 10:11:44 AM »

Offline lightspeed5

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • ****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Tommy Points: 283
ask lebron who is the only player who can outsmart him.

Re: The truth is... we don't need Rondo
« Reply #7 on: January 08, 2013, 10:15:18 AM »

Online BleedGreen1989

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • ****
  • Posts: 4883
  • Tommy Points: 468
Wooow OP I'm excited about last night too but slow down with that idea lol
***DKC Denver Nuggets***
http://tinyurl.com/nn6mgxg

Re: The truth is... we don't need Rondo
« Reply #8 on: January 08, 2013, 10:18:05 AM »

Offline mr. dee

  • Jeff Green
  • Posts: 734
  • Tommy Points: 56
I guess Bulls doesn't need Rose since they are doing fine...


http://stickerish.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/****WhiteSS.png

Re: The truth is... we don't need Rondo
« Reply #9 on: January 08, 2013, 10:18:45 AM »

Offline Edgar

  • Global Moderator
  • Kevin McHale
  • ************************
  • Posts: 24662
  • Tommy Points: 438
  • No contaban con mi astucia !!!
when is next game?
Once a CrotorNat always a CROTORNAT  2 times CB draft Champion 2009-2012

Visit the CelticsBlog Live Game Chat![/url]

Re: The truth is... we don't need Rondo
« Reply #10 on: January 08, 2013, 10:19:47 AM »

Offline Moranis

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9783
  • Tommy Points: 418
I created THIS THREAD last year saying we should trade Rondo because of his immaturity and emotion.  He is far too immature and emotional to be the leader of a title contender.  When the emotion is on and works, he is a superstar, but when the emotion is off he plays poorly, doesn't hustle, is very inconsistent, and finds himself often making stupid decisions (getting T'd up, and sometimes ejected or suspended).  In addition, Rondo also would net the greatest return given his ability, production, and contract.  Thus I'm all for trading Rondo, I just wouldn't move him just to move him, but if Boston could get back good value, I would be all for it.

Something like this 3 team trade would be good for me.

Boston gets Cousins, Robinson, Brooks
Sacramento gets Rondo, Gay, Melo
Memphis gets Evans, Salmons, Bass
2014 Pick 2 Draft 18th pick of 20
Sacramento Kings
Starters - Isaiah Thomas, Eric Gordon, Jimmy Butler, Dirk Nowitzki, Demarcus Cousins
Bench - Kendall Marshall, Michael Carter-Williams, Vince Carter, Wesley Johnson, Marcus Morris, Miles Plumlee, Nerlens Noel

Re: The truth is... we don't need Rondo
« Reply #11 on: January 08, 2013, 10:30:27 AM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10779
  • Tommy Points: 672
I was wondering how long it would take for a silly thread like this to come up.
DKC: GM Boston Celtics: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuCTllmkG26udHRaa0xrWm1qZTExaHltaEdtZzVRNFE&usp=sharing#gid=50
PG:Rondo/Udrih/Dinwiddle
SG:Williams/Miller/Delladova
SF:Afflalo/Young
PF:Green/Hill/Powell
C:Hibbert/Nurcik/Bynum

Re: The truth is... we don't need Rondo
« Reply #12 on: January 08, 2013, 10:31:53 AM »

Offline slamtheking

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11345
  • Tommy Points: 2413
we're much better with Rondo than without.  don't let 1 game fool you. 

Re: The truth is... we don't need Rondo
« Reply #13 on: January 08, 2013, 10:37:09 AM »

Offline crownsy

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8409
  • Tommy Points: 144
I created THIS THREAD last year saying we should trade Rondo because of his immaturity and emotion.  He is far too immature and emotional to be the leader of a title contender.  When the emotion is on and works, he is a superstar, but when the emotion is off he plays poorly, doesn't hustle, is very inconsistent, and finds himself often making stupid decisions (getting T'd up, and sometimes ejected or suspended).  In addition, Rondo also would net the greatest return given his ability, production, and contract.  Thus I'm all for trading Rondo, I just wouldn't move him just to move him, but if Boston could get back good value, I would be all for it.

Something like this 3 team trade would be good for me.

Boston gets Cousins, Robinson, Brooks
Sacramento gets Rondo, Gay, Melo
Memphis gets Evans, Salmons, Bass

So you want to trade a precieved locker room head case for cousins, a guy who is always one step away from an arrest warrent and such a locker room disaster that Sacramento is willing to deal him to get rid of the headache?

This is what i don't get, everyone wants to talk about how cousins makes you good for the next 10 years, and his issues are a non-factor, but if thats so, how come Sacramento can't run away from him fast enough?


Never mind that cousin's stupid off the court and locker room antics are so bad that it can't all be kept quite in SACRAMENTO for gods sake, you think the constant media pressure here is going to help with his crazy behind?
“I will hurt you for this. A day will come when you think you’re safe and happy and your joy will turn to ashes in your mouth. And you will know the debt is paid.” – Tyrion

Re: The truth is... we don't need Rondo
« Reply #14 on: January 08, 2013, 10:38:12 AM »

Online BleedGreen1989

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • ****
  • Posts: 4883
  • Tommy Points: 468


 ;)

I still can't believe we lost that game.. :(
***DKC Denver Nuggets***
http://tinyurl.com/nn6mgxg

 

Hello! Guest

Welcome to the CelticsBlog Forums.

Welcome to CelticsBlog