CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.

CelticsBlog ForumsAround the LeagueTrade Ideas and RumorsTrade Idea: Pierce + Collins for Pau Gasol
Page: [1] 2 3   
Author Topic: Trade Idea: Pierce + Collins for Pau Gasol  (Read 3005 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
kozlodoev
Paul Silas
******

Tommy Points: 377
Offline Offline

Posts: 6522



Email
« on: January 06, 2013, 04:05:50 PM »

Discuss.
Nothing to see here

Managing Rilski Sportist to glory at http://www.buzzerbeater.com
Kane3387
Bailey Howell
****

Tommy Points: 427
Offline Offline

Posts: 4472


Intensity!!!


Email
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2013, 04:13:16 PM »

No way but bass lee and green for gasol makes sense for both teams.
Nothing to see here

Duuuude whaaaat is up with yo shorts?...



Bird, Issel
eja117
Don Nelson
*********

Tommy Points: 462
Offline Offline

Posts: 9841



WWWEmail
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2013, 04:15:30 PM »

And put Jeff Green at sf?  wow
Nothing to see here

kozlodoev
Paul Silas
******

Tommy Points: 377
Offline Offline

Posts: 6522



Email
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2013, 04:18:38 PM »

No way but bass lee and green for gasol makes sense for both teams.
It doesn't, because the only way to accommodate Gasol's salary slot is to dump Pierce or another contract of comparable magnitude (he's signed for $19,000,000 this season).

So the question is, indeed, is putting Green at the starting SF slot worth taking a chance on Gasol's knees? Could it be addition by substraction?

edit: Just saw you actually tossed Lee in the equation. Don't like that version, we're left with not enough bodies, and I think it's a less feasible scenario, since I don't think Gasol will be available for a pile of spare parts.
« Last Edit: January 06, 2013, 04:24:13 PM by kozlodoev » Nothing to see here

Managing Rilski Sportist to glory at http://www.buzzerbeater.com
Neurotic Guy
Paul Silas
******

Tommy Points: 846
Offline Offline

Posts: 6329


Email
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2013, 04:20:22 PM »

No way but bass lee and green for gasol makes sense for both teams.

I'd be thrilled with this. Three 15-20 mpg role players for a top big.  Makes us much better and makes the Lakers worse. Perfect.
Nothing to see here
Neurotic Guy
Paul Silas
******

Tommy Points: 846
Offline Offline

Posts: 6329


Email
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2013, 04:22:06 PM »

No way but bass lee and green for gasol makes sense for both teams.
It doesn't, because the only way to accommodate Gasol's salary slot is to dump Pierce or another contract of comparable magnitude (he's signed for $19,000,000 this season).

So the question is, indeed, is putting Green at the starting SF slot worth taking a chance on Gasol's knees? Could it be addition by substraction?

It's a silly argument because there is no way Green/Bass/Lee get Gasol, but I think they do add up to a bout 19m in salary. It would work on that front.
Nothing to see here
Accension13
Jeff Green


Tommy Points: 5
Offline Offline

Posts: 125


Email
« Reply #6 on: January 06, 2013, 04:24:10 PM »

The only player I trade pierce for that is rumored to be available is Gay and maybe cousins.  Gasol is not only lost in the Lakers system, but he seems to have lost his confidence and he is on the decline overall
Nothing to see here
kozlodoev
Paul Silas
******

Tommy Points: 377
Offline Offline

Posts: 6522



Email
« Reply #7 on: January 06, 2013, 04:25:31 PM »

No way but bass lee and green for gasol makes sense for both teams.
It doesn't, because the only way to accommodate Gasol's salary slot is to dump Pierce or another contract of comparable magnitude (he's signed for $19,000,000 this season).

So the question is, indeed, is putting Green at the starting SF slot worth taking a chance on Gasol's knees? Could it be addition by substraction?

It's a silly argument because there is no way Green/Bass/Lee get Gasol, but I think they do add up to a bout 19m in salary. It would work on that front.
Yeah, didn't see that Lee was in the lot.
Nothing to see here

Managing Rilski Sportist to glory at http://www.buzzerbeater.com
ImShakHeIsShaq
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 281
Online Online

Posts: 1805



Email
« Reply #8 on: January 06, 2013, 04:38:20 PM »

So we are just going to discount what PP does? We are going to put our team on Gasol or Green's back in the playoffs (hahaha Green)? Green is definitely going to score equally to Lebroid in most of a 7 game series. We need someone who could go out and get us 10pts in a row if needed and be cold blooded in the clutch... yea, I trust Green (hahaha) and Gasol to do that. 0.0 Sure, that might be an okay team but it definitely is missing a star player (I know we have KG and RR but as good as they are, they aren't PP on offense and you need a PP, LeBroid, and Jordan type player to win chips).


I'll pass!
Nothing to see here

It takes me 3hrs to get to Miami and 1hr to get to Orlando... but I *SPIT* on their NBA teams! "Bless God and bless the (Celtics)"-Lady GaGa (teehee)
Neurotic Guy
Paul Silas
******

Tommy Points: 846
Offline Offline

Posts: 6329


Email
« Reply #9 on: January 06, 2013, 04:41:55 PM »

And put Jeff Green at sf?  wow

Everything would change offensively.  You'd be getting 15 more points a night from the frontcourt.  If Green played some D and scored 12-15 a night it would be fine. Package Sully for Gay?  Anyway, why would LA do this?  To make them older and smaller?
Nothing to see here
celtsfan619
Chris Wilcox


Tommy Points: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 33


Email
« Reply #10 on: January 06, 2013, 04:47:41 PM »

living in LA with a dad who is a die hard laker fan i end up watching some laker games and if you are frustrated with our bigs right now i guarantee that you will be just as frustrated with gasoft. he looks horrible. all he does is chuck up threes and brick them all. he brings absolutely no low post presence because his knees and feet are shot and he isn't as quick or agile as before so he just camps out in the perimeter being a non factor
Nothing to see here
Celts Fan 92
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 122
Offline Offline

Posts: 1423


Email
« Reply #11 on: January 06, 2013, 04:59:04 PM »

have yall seen Pau Gasol dis year? rofl hell naw to dis deal. yall really wont appreciate Pierce til he's gone
Nothing to see here
Change
Paul Silas
******

Tommy Points: 544
Offline Offline

Posts: 6666



Email
« Reply #12 on: January 06, 2013, 05:00:29 PM »

nothing to discuss cause you are joking....right?
Nothing to see here

ImShakHeIsShaq
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 281
Online Online

Posts: 1805



Email
« Reply #13 on: January 06, 2013, 05:01:42 PM »

And put Jeff Green at sf?  wow

Everything would change offensively.  You'd be getting 15 more points a night from the frontcourt.  If Green played some D and scored 12-15 a night it would be fine. Package Sully for Gay?  Anyway, why would LA do this?  To make them older and smaller?

You can't just plug Green into the starting lineup and think he is going to get the same 15pts he got with OKC... what about the clog our paint is going to have when you add guys who aren't good at scoring on the perimeter? Jeff Green and Pau aren't good from outside, neither is RR, so you have 3 guys who need to be inside to score? That's not going to work! You can't just take numbers and plug them in and think that's a team that will work. RR will then have NO room to operate, KG won't be open nearly as much b/c teams can focus more on him. KG is great from 18 in but he isn't a threat from 3 often, so he's pretty much another clog close to the paint.... where is the spacing?? I'm sorry but that is a jumbled mess of a team on offense. I don't see that working.
Nothing to see here

It takes me 3hrs to get to Miami and 1hr to get to Orlando... but I *SPIT* on their NBA teams! "Bless God and bless the (Celtics)"-Lady GaGa (teehee)
alajet
Kevin Garnett


Tommy Points: 54
Offline Offline

Posts: 787


Email
« Reply #14 on: January 06, 2013, 05:11:58 PM »

In short, no.
To give an elaborative answer, no.
Nothing to see here
Pages: [1] 2 3   


User Tools

Welcome Guest

Welcome to the CelticsBlog Forums.
SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines