CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.

CelticsBlog ForumsCeltics BasketballCeltics TalkWhats with all these trade ideas after wins?
Page: 1 [2]   
Author Topic: Whats with all these trade ideas after wins?  (Read 2310 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Celtics18
Antoine Walker
*****

Tommy Points: 560
Offline Offline

Posts: 5100


Email
« Reply #15 on: January 06, 2013, 11:08:17 AM »

After two wins we are suddenly "clicking"... a mediocre team tends to win half their games.  We could get blown out in our next game and everyone who is saying we are "clicking" will be right back on the "trade everyone!" panic mobile.   I like to cut out the middle man and stay the course with facts... I don't care about a couple random wins.  This team has problems.  I hope we can fix them through trades. 

Danny once made a major trade after a 5 game win streak.  Luckily he's not as wishywashy as Celtic fans.  I feel the same way about this team today as I did last week... we have too many backup shooting guards and not enough starting big men.  Two wins isn't going to change Danny's goal.

I haven't changed my mind based on our current two game win streak, and I didn't change my mind after our recent embarrassing four game losing streak.  I've never thought that this team's ceiling is mediocrity. 

And, I'm not going to panic and call to "trade everyone!"  This is, and was always, a good team.  I'm hoping that we are finally starting to click.  I don't expect us to get the through the rest of the regular season without some more poor moments.  I'm willing to accept those as part of a grueling 82 game season.  We'll be right there when it matters, though. 
Nothing to see here
KGs Knee
Don Chaney
***

Tommy Points: 261
Online Online

Posts: 3559


Email
« Reply #16 on: January 06, 2013, 11:12:51 AM »

One win or one loss shouldn't change whether or not to make a trade.

tp
Nothing to see here
scaryjerry
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 68
Offline Offline

Posts: 1497



Email
« Reply #17 on: January 06, 2013, 11:15:54 AM »

Because right or wrong wins increase the trade value of some and we could still use a trade, 2 wins doesn't change that
Nothing to see here
Boston Garden Leprechaun
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 110
Offline Offline

Posts: 1673



Email
« Reply #18 on: January 06, 2013, 10:02:34 PM »

After two wins we are suddenly "clicking"... a mediocre team tends to win half their games.  We could get blown out in our next game and everyone who is saying we are "clicking" will be right back on the "trade everyone!" panic mobile.   I like to cut out the middle man and stay the course with facts... I don't care about a couple random wins.  This team has problems.  I hope we can fix them through trades. 

Danny once made a major trade after a 5 game win streak.  Luckily he's not as wishywashy as Celtic fans.  I feel the same way about this team today as I did last week... we have too many backup shooting guards and not enough starting big men.  Two wins isn't going to change Danny's goal.

agreed.
Nothing to see here

BudweiserCeltic
Danny Ainge
**********

Tommy Points: 1018
Offline Offline

Posts: 10187


Email
« Reply #19 on: January 07, 2013, 09:04:18 AM »

After two wins we are suddenly "clicking"... a mediocre team tends to win half their games.  We could get blown out in our next game and everyone who is saying we are "clicking" will be right back on the "trade everyone!" panic mobile.   I like to cut out the middle man and stay the course with facts... I don't care about a couple random wins.  This team has problems.  I hope we can fix them through trades. 

Danny once made a major trade after a 5 game win streak.  Luckily he's not as wishywashy as Celtic fans.  I feel the same way about this team today as I did last week... we have too many backup shooting guards and not enough starting big men.  Two wins isn't going to change Danny's goal.


SGs are fine, it's the PF redundancy that is the problem, so if you want a big, your priority has to be to trade a big, like Bass. If a SG is needed to make the deal happen, then you do it. But the problem is not having too many SGs, the problem is having too many PFs without centers, and PFs in particular that can't play with each other.

Having too many SGs would only be a problem if we didn't have roster spaces available to add players... but we do.
Nothing to see here
Boston Garden Leprechaun
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 110
Offline Offline

Posts: 1673



Email
« Reply #20 on: January 07, 2013, 10:24:07 AM »

After two wins we are suddenly "clicking"... a mediocre team tends to win half their games.  We could get blown out in our next game and everyone who is saying we are "clicking" will be right back on the "trade everyone!" panic mobile.   I like to cut out the middle man and stay the course with facts... I don't care about a couple random wins.  This team has problems.  I hope we can fix them through trades. 

Danny once made a major trade after a 5 game win streak.  Luckily he's not as wishywashy as Celtic fans.  I feel the same way about this team today as I did last week... we have too many backup shooting guards and not enough starting big men.  Two wins isn't going to change Danny's goal.


SGs are fine, it's the PF redundancy that is the problem, so if you want a big, your priority has to be to trade a big, like Bass. If a SG is needed to make the deal happen, then you do it. But the problem is not having too many SGs, the problem is having too many PFs without centers, and PFs in particular that can't play with each other.

Having too many SGs would only be a problem if we didn't have roster spaces available to add players... but we do.

yep. that too.
Nothing to see here

Pages: 1 [2]   


User Tools

Welcome Guest

Welcome to the CelticsBlog Forums.
SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines