CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.

CelticsBlog ForumsCeltics BasketballCeltics TalkIf KG was never traded here. Where would Danny be?
Page: [1] 2   
Author Topic: If KG was never traded here. Where would Danny be?  (Read 2643 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
KG Living Legend
Kevin Garnett


Tommy Points: 142
Offline Offline

Posts: 908


Email
« on: January 03, 2013, 02:39:44 PM »


 If his buddy Kevin Mchale, never sent Garnett to the Celtics. And obviously Mchale would never have sent him to the Lakers the other option he had.

 We traded a bunch of crap to get KG. He was so lucky to knoe Mchale. Big Al was the only good piece in that deal. Is there anyone here saying that Danny is a great GM if that trade never happened.
Nothing to see here
Roy H.
Forums Manager
Dennis Johnson
******************

Tommy Points: -29957
Offline Offline

Posts: 18530


33,333 posts and counting . . .


Email
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2013, 02:42:51 PM »

If the trade didn't happen, Danny would have made a different trade.  Perhaps he makes a trade for Pau Gasol.  There was pretty much no way that he was going to let Ratliff's deal expire without getting anything back.

As an aside, based upon the returns other teams have gotten for star players, is it really so hard to believe that Big Al + cap relief + picks was the best deal on the table?  I've never understood the "McHale gave us KG to help his buddy out" angle.
Nothing to see here


All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Once a CrotoNat, always a CrotoNat.  CelticsBlog Draft Champions, 2009 & 2012
rondohondo
Paul Silas
******

Tommy Points: 665
Online Online

Posts: 6430



Email
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2013, 02:44:09 PM »

If the trade didn't happen, Danny would have made a different trade.  Perhaps he makes a trade for Pau Gasol.  There was pretty much no way that he was going to let Ratliff's deal expire without getting anything back.

yup Gasol would have been the main target
Nothing to see here

Chris
Global Moderator
JoJo White
*****************

Tommy Points: 600
Offline Offline

Posts: 17305



Email
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2013, 02:46:44 PM »

Who knows?

Maybe if he didn't make the KG trade, he would have made another move that lifted the team up.

I think Danny has shown the patience, understanding of the cap, and ability to think outside the box, that it takes to make a good GM.  But like with any GM, you need a little luck.  Whether it is a bounce of the pingpong balls, or whether it is having a superstar come on the market, when you have the pieces to make the deal happen.

Also, to suggest Big Al was the only good piece in that deal is incorrect.  Ratliff's contract was absolutely crucial to making that deal happen, and they also had a number of draft picks to include to sweeten it, and even guys like Gomes and Green had enough value at that point to make it happen. 
Nothing to see here
KG Living Legend
Kevin Garnett


Tommy Points: 142
Offline Offline

Posts: 908


Email
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2013, 02:54:45 PM »


 OK great, lets say we get Gasol. Does Ray Allen want to play with Gasol? Doubtful.

 If you don't think Danny's relationship with Mchale had a lot do with him coming here then your not real familiar with business transactions.

 Bottom line extremely doubtful we win a championship in the Ainge Era without the Garnett trade. And Danny is no more that an above average GM.
Nothing to see here
Fafnir
Global Moderator
Sam Jones
**********************

Tommy Points: 839
Offline Offline

Posts: 22321



Email
« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2013, 03:00:30 PM »

If the trade didn't happen, Danny would have made a different trade.  Perhaps he makes a trade for Pau Gasol.  There was pretty much no way that he was going to let Ratliff's deal expire without getting anything back.

As an aside, based upon the returns other teams have gotten for star players, is it really so hard to believe that Big Al + cap relief + picks was the best deal on the table?  I've never understood the "McHale gave us KG to help his buddy out" angle.
I really think we'd have gotten Gasol instead.
Nothing to see here

Chris
Global Moderator
JoJo White
*****************

Tommy Points: 600
Offline Offline

Posts: 17305



Email
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2013, 03:12:15 PM »


 OK great, lets say we get Gasol. Does Ray Allen want to play with Gasol? Doubtful.

 If you don't think Danny's relationship with Mchale had a lot do with him coming here then your not real familiar with business transactions.

 Bottom line extremely doubtful we win a championship in the Ainge Era without the Garnett trade. And Danny is no more that an above average GM.

And Danny's relationship with certain agents delivered him Posey, and has greased the skids of other deals.  Then there are the stories of no one accepting Kahn's calls, because all of the other GMs thinks he's a (well, something I won't say on this site).

Like you said, its part of the business, so why is it being held against him, that he uses his personal connections as a competitive advantage?

You can play that what if game all you want, but when it comes down to it, Danny DID trade for Kevin Garnett.  Danny DID turn a team at the bottom of the lottery to a championship team.  Danny DID get that team back to a second Finals, and another ECF.

That's what happened.  What's the point of talking about what ifs, other than to just manufacture reasons to bash a guy who has had a lot of success doing his job?
Nothing to see here
pearljammer10
Jim Loscutoff
********

Tommy Points: 407
Offline Offline

Posts: 8069



Email
« Reply #7 on: January 03, 2013, 03:30:50 PM »


 OK great, lets say we get Gasol. Does Ray Allen want to play with Gasol? Doubtful.

 If you don't think Danny's relationship with Mchale had a lot do with him coming here then your not real familiar with business transactions.

 Bottom line extremely doubtful we win a championship in the Ainge Era without the Garnett trade. And Danny is no more that an above average GM.

Why wouldnt Ray want to play with Gasol? Gasol is one of the leagues best big men (off year this year yes) but was playing very good basketball at the time. He is also a great passer. And if we didnt get KG I bet he was our prime target. There was no way we werent going to make a trade for a third superstar at that time.

Would we have had a different team absolutely. A championship? Who knows. But Ray was already on the team regardless of who we traded for. Why would it have been Rays decision on whom he wanted to play with?
Nothing to see here
kozlodoev
Paul Silas
******

Tommy Points: 378
Offline Offline

Posts: 6527



Email
« Reply #8 on: January 03, 2013, 03:37:12 PM »


 OK great, lets say we get Gasol. Does Ray Allen want to play with Gasol? Doubtful.

 If you don't think Danny's relationship with Mchale had a lot do with him coming here then your not real familiar with business transactions.

 Bottom line extremely doubtful we win a championship in the Ainge Era without the Garnett trade. And Danny is no more that an above average GM.

Why wouldnt Ray want to play with Gasol? Gasol is one of the leagues best big men (off year this year yes) but was playing very good basketball at the time. He is also a great passer. And if we didnt get KG I bet he was our prime target. There was no way we werent going to make a trade for a third superstar at that time.

Would we have had a different team absolutely. A championship? Who knows. But Ray was already on the team regardless of who we traded for. Why would it have been Rays decision on whom he wanted to play with?
It's not an off year, he's been dealing with chronic knee issues. But despite all the grief he was catching on CB, he was the league's second best center when he was starting on that position for the Lakers.
Nothing to see here

Managing Rilski Sportist to glory at http://www.buzzerbeater.com
jambr380
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 41
Online Online

Posts: 1551


Email
« Reply #9 on: January 03, 2013, 03:49:20 PM »

If the trade didn't happen, Danny would have made a different trade.  Perhaps he makes a trade for Pau Gasol.  There was pretty much no way that he was going to let Ratliff's deal expire without getting anything back.

As an aside, based upon the returns other teams have gotten for star players, is it really so hard to believe that Big Al + cap relief + picks was the best deal on the table?  I've never understood the "McHale gave us KG to help his buddy out" angle.

I totally agree. The trade was pretty fair, in my opinion. Of course [in hindsight] the Celtics ended up getting the better end of the deal, but there was certainly no guarantee that KG would still be productive today. Also, we didn't force the Wolves to give up a very productive Big Al to Utah for Kosta Koufos or to choose Flynn over Stephen Curry in the 09 draft. The other pieces had potential, but those two pieces, along with the cap relief were the main parts of the deal.
Nothing to see here
Roy H.
Forums Manager
Dennis Johnson
******************

Tommy Points: -29957
Offline Offline

Posts: 18530


33,333 posts and counting . . .


Email
« Reply #10 on: January 03, 2013, 03:53:09 PM »


 If you don't think Danny's relationship with Mchale had a lot do with him coming here then your not real familiar with business transactions. .

True.  Because GMs only trade with their friends / former teammates.  And because so many other teams were offering young big men with near-all-star potential, and insured expiring contracts.

Danny paid value, especially in terms of a lot of the other superstar trades we've seen.
Nothing to see here


All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Once a CrotoNat, always a CrotoNat.  CelticsBlog Draft Champions, 2009 & 2012
triboy16f
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 80
Offline Offline

Posts: 1757


Email
« Reply #11 on: January 03, 2013, 03:53:50 PM »

The preferred options were

1. Draft Durant

2. Draft Horford. I read somewhere if the Celts had a chance at Horford, that Ainge would of been 50-50 to trade the pick that brought us Allen.

3. Trade for Ray Allen and KG (which happened and won us a ring)

4. Trade for Ray Allen still with the 5th pick. We would of had a lineup of Perk, Big Al, PP, Allen, Rondo that would of been interesting to watch.
Nothing to see here
Chris
Global Moderator
JoJo White
*****************

Tommy Points: 600
Offline Offline

Posts: 17305



Email
« Reply #12 on: January 03, 2013, 03:54:15 PM »


 If you don't think Danny's relationship with Mchale had a lot do with him coming here then your not real familiar with business transactions. .

True.  Because GMs only trade with their friends / former teammates.  And because so many other teams were offering young big men with near-all-star potential, and insured expiring contracts.

Even if it played a role though, why does it matter?  Isn't that how business works?  Its all about favors and relationships.  That is part of the job description. 
Nothing to see here
Roy H.
Forums Manager
Dennis Johnson
******************

Tommy Points: -29957
Offline Offline

Posts: 18530


33,333 posts and counting . . .


Email
« Reply #13 on: January 03, 2013, 03:56:35 PM »


 If you don't think Danny's relationship with Mchale had a lot do with him coming here then your not real familiar with business transactions. .

True.  Because GMs only trade with their friends / former teammates.  And because so many other teams were offering young big men with near-all-star potential, and insured expiring contracts.

Even if it played a role though, why does it matter?  Isn't that how business works?  Its all about favors and relationships.  That is part of the job description.

If the contention is that some GMs have better working relationships than others, I obviously agree with this.  As you say, building those relationships is part of the business.

However, there's this view among some fans that the KG deal was a "wink, wink" deal, where McHale took an inferior deal from the Celtics to help out his former franchise.  I think that's nonsense.
Nothing to see here


All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Once a CrotoNat, always a CrotoNat.  CelticsBlog Draft Champions, 2009 & 2012
LarBrd33
Tiny Archibald
*******

Tommy Points: 360
Offline Offline

Posts: 7241


Email
« Reply #14 on: January 03, 2013, 04:03:26 PM »

As others have mentioned, he would have traded for Gasol.  Danny was always about acquiring assets and trading them for veteran upgrades.

WE're in limbo right now.  Tail end of a short-lived contender and the start of a rebuild.  He's already seeking assets.
Nothing to see here
Pages: [1] 2   


User Tools

Welcome Guest

Welcome to the CelticsBlog Forums.
SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines